1970
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9904-1970-12587-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hölder and $L^p$ estimates for solutions of $\overline \partial u = f$ in strongly pseudoconvex domains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
97
1
3

Year Published

1970
1970
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
97
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…One cannot obtain the Mergelyan approximation property in several complex variables only with the simple topological hypothesis. Surprisingly, Diederich and Fornaess [8] Theorem (Kerzman [12], Henkin [11], Lieb [13] In the weakly pseudoconvex case, Fornaess and Nagel [9] got the same result when D C 2 is a pseudoconvex domain with real analytic boundary. Other generalizations can be found in [1,15].…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of The Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…One cannot obtain the Mergelyan approximation property in several complex variables only with the simple topological hypothesis. Surprisingly, Diederich and Fornaess [8] Theorem (Kerzman [12], Henkin [11], Lieb [13] In the weakly pseudoconvex case, Fornaess and Nagel [9] got the same result when D C 2 is a pseudoconvex domain with real analytic boundary. Other generalizations can be found in [1,15].…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of The Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This example is a modification of an example of Stein (see Kerzman [11] and Krantz [15]). Let D be the complex ellipsoid in en defined by D = {z E en II Z / + ... + I Z n_ 1 1 2 + Iznl2m < I}.…”
Section: A Special Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To deal with variable domains, we will use the Grauert bumps to extend ∂-closed forms to a continuous family of larger domains, keeping the forms ∂-closed. For a fixed domain, the extension technique is well known through the works of Kerzman [15] and others. To apply the extension for a continuous family of strongly pseudoconvex domains, we will obtain precise regularity results first for a smooth family of strictly convex domains by using the Lieb-Range solution operator [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In section 4, we study the regularity of ∂-solutions on variable domains first for strictly convex case and then for strictly pseudoconvex case. The Lieb-Range solution operator and Kerzman's extension method [15] for ∂-closed forms are used in section 4 where Theorem 1.1 (i) is proved in Theorem 4.10.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%