2001
DOI: 10.1002/hrm.4013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hold the Line: An Examination of Line vs. Staff Differences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(56 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there is considerable research available discussing trends in rater group differences (e.g., Church, 1997Church, , 2000Church & Waclawski, 2001c;Furnham & Stringfield, 1994;Harris & Schaubroeck, 1988;J. W. Johnson & Ferstl, 1999), these studies presume that these groups can be meaningfully combined.…”
Section: For Researchersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is considerable research available discussing trends in rater group differences (e.g., Church, 1997Church, , 2000Church & Waclawski, 2001c;Furnham & Stringfield, 1994;Harris & Schaubroeck, 1988;J. W. Johnson & Ferstl, 1999), these studies presume that these groups can be meaningfully combined.…”
Section: For Researchersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another similar study, Church and Waclawski (2001) observed staff personnel to be more fair and consistent in their dealings with people, accept and encourage feedback from others and flexible and adaptive in their roles. 10.…”
Section: Different Personality By Virtue Of Positionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The study of LMX and its impact on the performance of organisation is vital, as managers are more likely to face with difficulties to accomplish their goals and objectives in the long run by relying solely on formal authority. It is imperative that the capacity to influence subordinates is available, as organisations are striving to meet their mission vision by levelling the existing hierarchy within the organisation (Church and Waclawski, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%