2022
DOI: 10.3390/jof8080773
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Holarctic Species in the Pluteus romellii Clade. Five New Species Described and Old Names Reassessed

Abstract: We studied the taxonomy of Pluteus romellii, and morphologically similar Holarctic species in the /romellii clade of section Celluloderma, using morphological and molecular data (nrITS, TEF1-α). Pluteus romellii is lectotypified and epitypified and accepted as an exclusively Eurasian species. Pluteus lutescens and P. pallescens are considered synonyms of P. romellii. Pluteus fulvibadius is accepted as a related, but separate, North American species. Five species in the /romellii clade are described as new to s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On phylogenetic trees, P. siccus display a close relationship to P. aletaiensis ; morphologically, they are distinctly different, P. siccus ( Ševčíková et al, 2022 ) is distinguishable from P. aletaiensis due to its slightly velvety pileus with a greenish hue, and smaller basidiospores (about 4.6–6.0 × (3.5–)4.5–5.5 µm), the polymorphic cheilocystidia, and grows on decaying wood and geographically distributed in the Russian Far East. P. parvicarpus ( Ševčíková et al, 2022 ) could be distinguished from P. aletaiensis by its sulcate-striate at the margin of pileus, smaller basidiospores (about 4.5–6.0 × 4.2–5.5 µm), solitary on fallen branches of deciduous trees, and geographical distribution in the Russian Far East. P. aletaiensis and P. vellingae ( Ševčíková et al, 2022 ) are both with yellow-brown to brown pileus and similar basidiospores.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…On phylogenetic trees, P. siccus display a close relationship to P. aletaiensis ; morphologically, they are distinctly different, P. siccus ( Ševčíková et al, 2022 ) is distinguishable from P. aletaiensis due to its slightly velvety pileus with a greenish hue, and smaller basidiospores (about 4.6–6.0 × (3.5–)4.5–5.5 µm), the polymorphic cheilocystidia, and grows on decaying wood and geographically distributed in the Russian Far East. P. parvicarpus ( Ševčíková et al, 2022 ) could be distinguished from P. aletaiensis by its sulcate-striate at the margin of pileus, smaller basidiospores (about 4.5–6.0 × 4.2–5.5 µm), solitary on fallen branches of deciduous trees, and geographical distribution in the Russian Far East. P. aletaiensis and P. vellingae ( Ševčíková et al, 2022 ) are both with yellow-brown to brown pileus and similar basidiospores.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…P. parvicarpus ( Ševčíková et al, 2022 ) could be distinguished from P. aletaiensis by its sulcate-striate at the margin of pileus, smaller basidiospores (about 4.5–6.0 × 4.2–5.5 µm), solitary on fallen branches of deciduous trees, and geographical distribution in the Russian Far East. P. aletaiensis and P. vellingae ( Ševčíková et al, 2022 ) are both with yellow-brown to brown pileus and similar basidiospores. P. vellingae has broadly clavate to clavate or ovoid pleurocystidia, and it grows on coniferous or deciduous wood.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations