2002
DOI: 10.1086/342183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hokupa`a Anisoplanatism and Mauna Kea Turbulence Characterization

Abstract: A data set of adaptive optics images has been analyzed in order to study the effects of angular anisoplanatism and to characterize Mauna Kea nighttime turbulence. The data set consists of a selection of Galactic center images obtained with the adaptive optics instrument Hokupa'a and the near-infrared camera QUIRC on the Gemini-North 8 m telescope. Using the Strehl ratio and the FWHM as tracers for anisoplanatism in the images, it is possible to draw conclusions about the effective turbulence height by model-fi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(8 reference statements)
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is much lower than the assessment of the effective turbulence height of 6.5 km reported by Racine and Ellerbroek (1995). Our result is more consistent with, but still lower than, the height of 3.5 km evaluated at Gemini using the Hokupa'a AO system (Flicker, Rigaut 2002). Actual effective height of the turbulent layer may well be varying from night to night, as well as throughout the night.…”
Section: Isoplanatic Anglesupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This is much lower than the assessment of the effective turbulence height of 6.5 km reported by Racine and Ellerbroek (1995). Our result is more consistent with, but still lower than, the height of 3.5 km evaluated at Gemini using the Hokupa'a AO system (Flicker, Rigaut 2002). Actual effective height of the turbulent layer may well be varying from night to night, as well as throughout the night.…”
Section: Isoplanatic Anglesupporting
confidence: 83%
“…3. It can be seen how the total FWHM has a behavior consistent with what is observed for other AO PSFs (e.g., Flicker & Rigaut 2002).…”
Section: The Psf Model For Swansupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Ref [15]. reports only a 7.2% underestimate of the effective turbulence vertical range by this 5/3 model.…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%