2007
DOI: 10.2140/gt.2007.11.1581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hodge and signature theorems for a family of manifolds with fibre bundle boundary

Abstract: Over the past fifty years, Hodge and signature theorems have been proved for various classes of noncompact and incomplete Riemannian manifolds. Two of these classes are manifolds with incomplete cylindrical ends and manifolds with cone bundle ends, that is, whose ends have the structure of a fibre bundle over a compact oriented manifold, where the fibres are cones on a second fixed compact oriented manifold. In this paper, we prove Hodge and signature theorems for a family of metrics on a manifold M with fibre… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(53 reference statements)
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is interesting therefore to see how these can be seen as opposite limiting cases in a family of examples. A similar study, resulting in a family of Hodge and signature theorems, was done for singular manifolds with metrics between finite cylinders and cone bundles off a compact set in [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It is interesting therefore to see how these can be seen as opposite limiting cases in a family of examples. A similar study, resulting in a family of Hodge and signature theorems, was done for singular manifolds with metrics between finite cylinders and cone bundles off a compact set in [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This turns out to be related to perverse signatures, which are signatures defined for arbitrary perversities on arbitrary pseudomanifolds from the extended intersection pairing on intersection cohomology. Perverse signatures are defined in the two stratum case in [21] and more generally in [16]. Theorem 1.4.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of authors have considered variants of intersection homology that allow more general notions of perversity, including Beilinson, Bernstein, and Deligne [5]; MacPherson [40]; King [38]; Cappell and Shaneson [11]; Habegger and Saper [32]; the author [20,22,24]; Saralegi [48]; and Hausel, Mazzeo, and Hunsicker [34][35][36]. In many of these works, perversities are still required to satisfy at least some of the prior conditions, though completely arbitrary perversities appear as far back as 1982 in the work of Beilinson, Bernstein, and Deligne on perverse sheaves, and they occur more recently in work of the author [24] and Saralegi [48].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…that integration induces a linear duality isomorphism between the cohomology ofp-perverse liftable intersection differential forms and chain-theoretic perversityt −p "relative" intersection homology with real coefficients (see [48] for precise details). Non-traditional perversities also appear in an analytic setting in the works of Hausel, Hunsicker, and Mazzeo [34][35][36], in which they demonstrate that groups of L 2 harmonic forms on a manifold with fibered boundary can be identified with cohomology spaces associated to intersection cohomology groups of varying perversities for a canonical compactification of the manifold.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation