2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.12.080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

hnRNPDL Phase Separation Is Regulated by Alternative Splicing and Disease-Causing Mutations Accelerate Its Aggregation

Abstract: Highlights d hnRNPDL requires both N-and C-terminal IDRs to phase separate d The absence of N-terminal IDR facilitates aggregation d The unique combination of IDRs in each isoform determines its cellular behavior d D378N/H mutations accelerate hnRNPDL aggregation and compromise its solubility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
43
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
2
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, the amyloidogenic pathway seems driven by hydrophobic interactions [154]. In line with the behavior of tau, in the case of hnRNPDL, LLPS exerts a protective role against fibril formation [144]. On the contrary, when LLPS is triggered in vitro under high-salt concentrations, thereby becoming partially driven by hydrophobic contacts, a direct correlation with increased amyloid propensity is observed, suggesting that this two phenomena not only could occur under coinciding conditions but could also positively influence one another [154].…”
Section: Relevance Of Charge Decoration In Phase Separationmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Instead, the amyloidogenic pathway seems driven by hydrophobic interactions [154]. In line with the behavior of tau, in the case of hnRNPDL, LLPS exerts a protective role against fibril formation [144]. On the contrary, when LLPS is triggered in vitro under high-salt concentrations, thereby becoming partially driven by hydrophobic contacts, a direct correlation with increased amyloid propensity is observed, suggesting that this two phenomena not only could occur under coinciding conditions but could also positively influence one another [154].…”
Section: Relevance Of Charge Decoration In Phase Separationmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Different alternative splice isoforms that incorporate or remove different multivalent elements in IDRs (Box 1) have been shown to produce different phase separation propensities and changes in function, with effects mimicking those for insertion and deletion mutations. For example, different protein isoforms can disrupt or modulate phase separation (Smith et al, 2020) or cause irreversible protein aggregation in disease (Batlle et al, 2020). Moreover, changing the multivalent patterns in IDRs may lead to gain-of-toxic function by introducing new interaction partners and activating aberrant pathways (Han et al, 2020).…”
Section: How Can Mutations In Idrs Impact Phase Separation?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that HNRNPA2B1 is overexpressed in breast cancers (Hu et al, 2017). Splicing of alternative exons overlapping glycine-tyrosine rich (GY) motifs within hnRNPA/D C-terminal IDRs can regulate their phase separation propensity and splicing functions (Batlle et al, 2020;Gueroussov et al, 2017). Fibrillization can be enhanced in liquid condensed phases (Murakami et al, 2015;Patel et al, 2015), and missense mutations in the IDR of hnRNPA1 leading to pathological fibrillization have been reported (Molliex et al, 2015).…”
Section: Splicingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Bengoechea and collaborators reported an accumulation and co-localization of hnRNPA1 and hnRN-PA2/B1 with DNAJB6 in sarcoplasmic stress granules [67]. Further strengthening the link between hnRNPs and LGMD, hnRNPDL mutations were observed in LGMD1G [153], and are thought to cause disease through aggregation in muscle and loss of function [154].…”
Section: Other Hnrnpsmentioning
confidence: 99%