2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocs.2016.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HMV: A medical decision support framework using multi-layer classifiers for disease prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In former studies, it has been demonstrated that one single FS method cannot perform well with all classifiers and datasets. 26 The ensemble FS (EFS) method is therefore an effective approach to provide the optimal FS method. The EFS method is an approach that leads to higher stability and a better predictive model by aggregating many weaker prediction models.…”
Section: Phase-2: Ensemble Feature Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In former studies, it has been demonstrated that one single FS method cannot perform well with all classifiers and datasets. 26 The ensemble FS (EFS) method is therefore an effective approach to provide the optimal FS method. The EFS method is an approach that leads to higher stability and a better predictive model by aggregating many weaker prediction models.…”
Section: Phase-2: Ensemble Feature Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, no classifier can perform well for all datasets. 26 However, when a multilayer ensemble classifier is used, the placement of each classifier may affect the overall performance. As a consequence, using an ensemble classifier is a strong approach to get near to the optimal classifier for any dataset.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S. Bashir [19] presented heterogeneous classifier namely HMV for medical data classification. This classifier resolved the storage problem by selecting the important features for disease analysis, but it is difficult to perform in imbalanced medical datasets.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, the Table 2 represents the comparative study of existing and the proposed GDLR based medical disease classification. The Cleveland datasets are used to measure the performance of the proposed GDLR and compared with other existing method [18,19] in same dataset. The proposed GDLR method has the higher performance due to feature are selected by random forest are further analyzed by the GDLR to measure the feature weight value and classify the medical data based on the feature weight values.…”
Section: Quantitative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bashir et al proposed a multi‐layer classifier ensemble structure based on the optimal blend of heterogeneous classifiers, which is termed as “HMV (Hierarchical Majority Voting),” which overcomes the drawbacks of conventional performance bottlenecks by using an ensemble of seven heterogeneous classifiers, namely, Quadratic Discriminant Analysis, Support Vector Machine, Decision tree using Gini Index, Naïve Bayes, Linear Regression, Decision tree using Information Gain, and K‐Nearest neighbor. The dataset is collected from both heart disease dataset as well as real time dataset from PIMS hospital.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%