2002
DOI: 10.1007/bf02573891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

hMLH1 andhMSH2 gene mutation in Brazilian families with suspected hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer

Abstract: The hMLH1 gene had a higher mutation detection rate than hMSH2. The physician who deals with CRC must take into consideration the heredity issue with patients who present with an early age of onset or a familial history of CRC- or HNPCC-related cancers, including gastric cancer, even if they do not fulfill the former Amsterdam criteria.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, mutations in Colombian families were present more frequently in MLH1 than MSH2 as compared to our cohort [32]. Furthermore, the studies from Uruguay (461 patients) [33] and Brazil (25 families) [34] showed similar results with MLH1 as the most frequently mutated gene in their studies. A study of South American LS families from Brazil (101 families), Argentina (16 families) and Uruguay (6 families), demonstrated that 56.3% of the MMR mutations were found on the MLH1 gene [28].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…However, mutations in Colombian families were present more frequently in MLH1 than MSH2 as compared to our cohort [32]. Furthermore, the studies from Uruguay (461 patients) [33] and Brazil (25 families) [34] showed similar results with MLH1 as the most frequently mutated gene in their studies. A study of South American LS families from Brazil (101 families), Argentina (16 families) and Uruguay (6 families), demonstrated that 56.3% of the MMR mutations were found on the MLH1 gene [28].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The mutation spectrum is predominated by MLH1 (60%) and MSH2 (40%) mutations [3,19-22], but the seemingly larger contribution than the 42% and 33% reported in the InSIGHT database could reflect failure to test for MSH6 and PMS2 mutations in most South American studies [1]. Referral bias in populations that have more recently been screened for mutations represents a potential limitation, but the strong contribution from MLH1 and MSH2 could also reflect population structure [2,4,5,7]. Frameshift mutations and nonsense mutations were the most common types of mutations, which are in agreement with findings from other populations [1,23-26], with hotspots in exons 16 and 18 of MLH1 and in exon 13 of MSH2 (Figure 2b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Families that fulfilled the Amsterdam criteria [8,9] and/or the Bethesda guidelines [10] were selected from the hereditary cancer registries at the Hospital Italiano (Buenos Aires, Argentina), the Hospital de las Fuerzas Armadas (Montevideo, Uruguay), the Clinica Los Condes (Santiago, Chile), the Barretos Cancer Hospital (Barretos, Brazil) and from two databases in Colombia and in Southeastern Brazil (Figure 1, Table 1) [2,3,5,11]. Patients were informed about their inclusion into the registries, which generally contained data on family history, age at onset and results of genetic testing.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, MSH2 mutation carriers appear to have a higher risk of developing extra-colonic cancer than individuals with MLH1 mutation [7, 15, 16]. In addition, the frequency and the types of mutations are reported to differ in different geographical areas, therefore, the frequency of extra-colonic cancer associated with LS may be different in different populations [1719]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%