2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00251-010-0493-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HLArestrictor—a tool for patient-specific predictions of HLA restriction elements and optimal epitopes within peptides

Abstract: Traditionally, T cell epitope discovery requires considerable amounts of tedious, slow, and costly experimental work. During the last decade, prediction tools have emerged as essential tools allowing researchers to select a manageable list of epitope candidates to test from a larger peptide, protein, or even proteome. However, no current tools address the complexity caused by the highly polymorphic nature of the restricting HLA molecules, which effectively individualizes T cell responses. To fill this gap, we … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also analyzed the peptide-allele restrictions confirmed by Larsen et al (2010) (29). Out of the 18 peptides and respective restricting alleles, 7 peptide-allele combinations were present in RATE results for Los Alamos HIV database data set with the allele being expressed in at least one positive donor.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…We also analyzed the peptide-allele restrictions confirmed by Larsen et al (2010) (29). Out of the 18 peptides and respective restricting alleles, 7 peptide-allele combinations were present in RATE results for Los Alamos HIV database data set with the allele being expressed in at least one positive donor.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…S1 and Table S1 in the supplemental material), even though this HLA residue is one that is likely to affect both the B and C pockets of the peptidebinding groove (35). The failure of Gag-TL9 to bind adequately to HLA-B*42:02 could not be predicted using in silico-based prediction programs (13,47) or by experimentally determined peptidebinding motifs (25). There is no other example of closely related HLA molecules that differ only by the single Tyr¡His change at HLA residue 9 (38).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although PPIPVGDIY (PY9) has appeared in the "A" list of HIV-specific CD8 ϩ T-cell epitopes since 1995 (48) and epitope prediction programs predict that PY9 would bind better than NY10 to HLA-B*3501 (17), nonetheless PY9 is not the epitope. It is significant that 0/377 peptides eluted from HLA class I molecules and sequenced have Pro at P1 (44).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%