2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2008.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HLAMatchmaker-Defined Triplet Matching Is Not Associated with Better Survival Rates of Patients with Class I HLA Allele Mismatched Hematopoietic Cell Transplants from Unrelated Donors

Abstract: This report addresses the concept that permissible HLA mismatching, i.e. mismatches that do not generate an allogeneic response, in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) can be determined with structural similarity of polymorphic regions. We have applied the triplet version of a structural algorithm called HLAMatchmaker that considers short sequences involving polymorphic amino acid residues on the molecular surface as key elements of immunogenic epitopes. The triplet matching effect was analyzed in a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[21][22][23][24][25] For HLA class II, structural variability has been extensively studied in the context of solid organ transplantation, with some in silico models predictive of antibody formation and/or kidney transplant outcome already entered into clinical use. 26, 27 These models did not prove equally valid for HCT outcome prediction, 23,28 probably reflecting the more complex nature of HLA-peptide recognition by the T-cell receptor (TCR) compared with allo-antibodies. 29,30 Here, we have addressed the functional role of AA polymorphism in HLA class II for clinical outcome of HCT in the context of nonpermissive TCE mismatches at HLA-DPB1, shown by some 4,9 but not all 31 multicenter studies to be associated with mortality after 10/10 HLA-matched unrelated HCT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21][22][23][24][25] For HLA class II, structural variability has been extensively studied in the context of solid organ transplantation, with some in silico models predictive of antibody formation and/or kidney transplant outcome already entered into clinical use. 26, 27 These models did not prove equally valid for HCT outcome prediction, 23,28 probably reflecting the more complex nature of HLA-peptide recognition by the T-cell receptor (TCR) compared with allo-antibodies. 29,30 Here, we have addressed the functional role of AA polymorphism in HLA class II for clinical outcome of HCT in the context of nonpermissive TCE mismatches at HLA-DPB1, shown by some 4,9 but not all 31 multicenter studies to be associated with mortality after 10/10 HLA-matched unrelated HCT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the use of a UD with a single HLA mismatch (7/8) increases access to transplantation, transplants from HLA mismatched donors are associated with significantly higher risks for mortality and morbidity compared with those from 8/8 HLA matched donors. [6][7][8][9][10] Several algorithms that score the risk associated with HLA mismatches based on the sharing of serologic epitopes 11 and the location 12 or physicochemical properties of the amino acid differences 13,14 have been developed. None of these, however, has proven useful in independent validation studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The humoral alloimmune response to HLA class I mismatches can be successfully predicted by the HLAMatchmaker algorithm (20,21). As HLAMatchmaker takes only Ab-accessible sites of the HLA molecules into consideration, it is not a suitable tool to predict T cell alloreactivity (22).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%