2007
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2006-06-032193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HLA mismatching within or outside of cross-reactive groups (CREGs) is associated with similar outcomes after unrelated hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
33
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
33
2
Order By: Relevance
“…2 As the '10/10 matched' (that is, high-resolution identity at loci HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1 and -DQB1) donor is not always available, some extent of HLA mismatch (Mm) can be accepted; however, there is still some controversy about the precise impact of HLA mismatching on HSCT outcomes, because published reports indicate discordant results about the relative importance of loci involved. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] A recent study by Lee et al 3 indicated that both class I and class II Mms affect survival, suggesting that each HLA Mm is associated with an additional unadjusted survival impairment of 9-10%. The same study did not find a significant role played by HLA-DP or -DQ on survival.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 As the '10/10 matched' (that is, high-resolution identity at loci HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1 and -DQB1) donor is not always available, some extent of HLA mismatch (Mm) can be accepted; however, there is still some controversy about the precise impact of HLA mismatching on HSCT outcomes, because published reports indicate discordant results about the relative importance of loci involved. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] A recent study by Lee et al 3 indicated that both class I and class II Mms affect survival, suggesting that each HLA Mm is associated with an additional unadjusted survival impairment of 9-10%. The same study did not find a significant role played by HLA-DP or -DQ on survival.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, a recent analysis provided by Kawase et al 4 identified 16 significant highrisk HLA Mm combinations for severe acute GVHD (aGVHD), whereas the selection of a cross-reactive groupcompatible donor does not seem to improve transplant outcome. 9 This study was designed to assess the role of patientdonor HLA matching on the outcomes of unrelated HSCTs performed for haematological malignancies in 805 adult patients in Italy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, a recent study showed a similar outcome when antigen mismatch occurred within or outside crossreactive groups. 34 In 2007, the NMDP has published a study clarifying previous controversial findings. This NMDP report includes 3857 URD transplants performed between 1988 and 2003.…”
Section: Donor Selectionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although multiple strategies have been sought to identify "permissible mismatches" associated with improved outcomes of a single-allele MMUD HCT, 13,[16][17][18][19] the clinical significance of clustering mismatched alleles within HLA class I or II supertypes has not been established. We therefore conducted a large registry analysis of the CIBMTR database of single-allele mismatched myeloablative allografts to determine whether HLA class I or II supertype mismatching is associated with worse outcomes after 7/8 MMUD alloHCT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%