1986
DOI: 10.1007/bf00454876
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HLA-DR 3 is associated with a more slowly progressive form of Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes

Abstract: The presence of HLA-DR 3 was analysed in 745 patients with Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes with age at diagnosis between 1-19 years. HLA-DR 3 and/or 4 was found in 678/745 (91%) of the patients. Presence of DR2 with neither DR 3 nor 4 was demonstrated in 15 patients. Patients with HLA-DR 3 without DR 4 presented with Type 1 diabetes more evenly over the year; they also presented without incidence peaks at 7 years or 10-11 years, as seen especially in DR 3/4 patients. The DR 3 patients more often had mild d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
48
2

Year Published

1987
1987
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(9 reference statements)
5
48
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Because ICA512/IA-2A has been shown to predict type 1 diabetes, most likely as a marker of ongoing ␤-cell destruction, we speculate that this process may be decelerated in DQ2 individuals because of a reduced immune response to ICA512/IA-2. This speculation is consistent with the observation that DQ2-DR3 patients have higher C-peptide levels at the time of clinical diagnosis (44,45).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because ICA512/IA-2A has been shown to predict type 1 diabetes, most likely as a marker of ongoing ␤-cell destruction, we speculate that this process may be decelerated in DQ2 individuals because of a reduced immune response to ICA512/IA-2. This speculation is consistent with the observation that DQ2-DR3 patients have higher C-peptide levels at the time of clinical diagnosis (44,45).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In the exploratory analysis, the unadjusted frequency of IAA increased with the number of class I alleles of INS VNTR: 15% of III/III patients (95% CI 0 -30), 30% of I/III patients (22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38), and 40% of I/I patients (35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45) were positive for IAA. Unadjusted frequencies of IAA were higher in DQ8-positive than in DQ8-negative patients: 27% of patients with no DQ8 haplotypes (95% CI 20 -34), 41% of patients with one DQ8 haplotype (35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46), and 42% of patients with two DQ8 haplotypes (26 -57) were positive for IAA. Finally, the unadjusted frequencies in Table 5 support numerous observations that IAAs are more common in younger than in older patients.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This risk increased with the number of antibodies present, as indicated by both survival analysis and Cox regression, and in carriers of HLA DQ2, regardless of DQ8 status, it is consistent with the reported preferential association of GADA with DQ2 in new-onset patients [31][32][33]. The differential HLA DQ enhancement of progression to diabetes according to IA-2A status supports previous suggestions that different diabetogenic pathways may converge to the same clinical endpoint of immune-mediated type 1 diabetes [35,36]. Nevertheless, progression to diabetes in antibody-positive carriers of DQ2 remains low in the absence of IA-2A.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In multivariate analysis, the persistence of antibodies was primarily related to the respective levels at diagnosis, which is in agreement with previous observations for ICA (11). The additional association of persisting GADA levels with the absence of HLA DQA1*0301-DQB1*0302 and residual C-peptide levels 2 years after diagnosis is indicative of a less aggressive form of the disease (27,28). Likewise, persisting IA-2-A levels were associated with older age and the absence of HLA DQA1*0501-DQB1*0201, which is consistent with previous correlations at clinical onset (20,22,29).…”
supporting
confidence: 89%