2013
DOI: 10.1111/dme.12148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HLA class II gene associations in African American Type 1 diabetes reveal a protective HLA‐DRB1*03 haplotype

Abstract: AimsOwing to strong linkage disequilibrium between markers, pinpointing disease associations within genetic regions is difficult in European ancestral populations, most notably the very strong association of the HLA-DRB1*03-DQA1*05:01-DQB1*02:01 haplotype with Type 1 diabetes risk, which is assumed to be because of a combination of HLA-DRB1 and HLA-DQB1. In contrast, populations of African ancestry have greater haplotype diversity, offering the possibility of narrowing down regions and strengthening support fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, associations for T1D are stronger at HLA class II ( HLA-DRB1 , -DQA1 , and - DQB1 ) than HLA class I regions in Europeans [33][34], [38][41] (http://www.t1dbase.org). In African Americans, T1D individuals showed both shared and unique risk and protective HLA class II haplotypes as compared to European T1D individuals [42][43]. More importantly, these individuals also showed substantially stronger associations at HLA class II ( P <1×10 −25 ) than class I regions ( P <1×10 −5 ) [42], which is in contradiction with our finding of stronger associations at HLA class I than class II regions in T2D individuals ( HLA - B , Figure S4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, associations for T1D are stronger at HLA class II ( HLA-DRB1 , -DQA1 , and - DQB1 ) than HLA class I regions in Europeans [33][34], [38][41] (http://www.t1dbase.org). In African Americans, T1D individuals showed both shared and unique risk and protective HLA class II haplotypes as compared to European T1D individuals [42][43]. More importantly, these individuals also showed substantially stronger associations at HLA class II ( P <1×10 −25 ) than class I regions ( P <1×10 −5 ) [42], which is in contradiction with our finding of stronger associations at HLA class I than class II regions in T2D individuals ( HLA - B , Figure S4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In African Americans, T1D individuals showed both shared and unique risk and protective HLA class II haplotypes as compared to European T1D individuals [42][43]. More importantly, these individuals also showed substantially stronger associations at HLA class II ( P <1×10 −25 ) than class I regions ( P <1×10 −5 ) [42], which is in contradiction with our finding of stronger associations at HLA class I than class II regions in T2D individuals ( HLA - B , Figure S4). The observed HLA-B association may be due to LD with nearby causal gene(s) since there is long range LD in this region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a closely-related version of DR7, DRB1*07:01-DQA1*03:01-DQB1*02:02, found in African populations, is not protective for T1D but is, in fact, predisposing for T1D [36,68,69]. Similarly, an African-Specific DR3, DRB1*03:02-DQA1*04:01-DQB1*04:02, has the opposite T1D susceptibility effect (protection) to that of the common, predisposing DR3 haplotype, DRB1*03:01-DQA1*05:01-DQB1*02:01, seen in most other populations [36,70]. The opposite effects of European and African DR3 and DR7 haplotypes are illustrated in Table 5.…”
Section: Hla Variation Among Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences in peptide binding affinities of the DR3 proteins encoded by *03:01 and *03:02 alleles may explain the observed differences in disease associations for these alleles. In African Americans, *03:02 confers protection against type I diabetes, whereas *03:01 increases risk (48). DRB1*03:01 is a strong risk factor for systemic erythematous lupus in whites (49), but neither *03:01 nor *03:02 confers risk for systemic erythematous lupus in African Americans (50).…”
Section: Original Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%