2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105395
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HKAM-MKM: A hybrid kernel alignment maximization-based multiple kernel model for identifying DNA-binding proteins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The EmbedCaps-DBP method's performance was compared with state-of-the-art methods using the same training and independent test datasets to ensure a fair evaluation. Table IV shows that we compared our proposed method with DNA-Prot [67], iDNA-Prot [21], iDNA-Prot|dis [68], MsDBP [31], DBP-CNN [1], and Target-DBPPred [10]. Most of these methods are sequence-based, with EI as their input.…”
Section: B Performance Comparison With Existing Predictors Using Pdb1...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The EmbedCaps-DBP method's performance was compared with state-of-the-art methods using the same training and independent test datasets to ensure a fair evaluation. Table IV shows that we compared our proposed method with DNA-Prot [67], iDNA-Prot [21], iDNA-Prot|dis [68], MsDBP [31], DBP-CNN [1], and Target-DBPPred [10]. Most of these methods are sequence-based, with EI as their input.…”
Section: B Performance Comparison With Existing Predictors Using Pdb1...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study used an independent dataset (PDB2272) to validate the proposed method. Table V compares the accuracy of its predictions with eight previous methods: DNA-Prot [67], iDNA-Prot [21], iDNA-Prot|dis [68], Local-DPP [20], MsDBP [31], DBP-CNN [51], Target-DBPPred [10], and HKAM-MKM [69]. EmbedCaps-DBP (ProtT5) performed better than all existing classifiers and had higher accuracy (by 12.65%), sensitivity (by 9.46%), specificity (by 14.65%), and MCC (by 0.25) than Target-DBPPred.…”
Section: B Performance Comparison With Existing Predictors Using Pdb1...mentioning
confidence: 99%