2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-10977-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HIV treatment engagement in the context of COVID-19: an observational global sample of transgender and nonbinary people living with HIV

Abstract: Background HIV services, like many medical services, have been disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic. However, there are limited data on the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on HIV treatment engagement outcomes among transgender (trans) and nonbinary people. This study addresses a pressing knowledge gap and is important in its global scope, its use of technology for recruitment, and focus on transgender people living with HIV. The objective of this study is to examine correlates of HIV infection a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies were conducted in more than 34 countries. Of all included studies, 10 were conducted in multiple countries (five or more),79 80 85 90 105–110 six of which spanned multiple geographical regions 105–110. While most studies (61%) did not specify setting, a quarter took place in urban or periurban regions,32 37 38 40 46 48 52 55 56 59 63–66 71 72 81 88 89 96–99 8% in rural areas57 58 60 68 73 91 103 and 7% directly compared outcomes in urban versus rural areas 51 54 61 69 75 87 Online supplemental table 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Studies were conducted in more than 34 countries. Of all included studies, 10 were conducted in multiple countries (five or more),79 80 85 90 105–110 six of which spanned multiple geographical regions 105–110. While most studies (61%) did not specify setting, a quarter took place in urban or periurban regions,32 37 38 40 46 48 52 55 56 59 63–66 71 72 81 88 89 96–99 8% in rural areas57 58 60 68 73 91 103 and 7% directly compared outcomes in urban versus rural areas 51 54 61 69 75 87 Online supplemental table 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…displays the characteristics of included studies. There was a relatively even distribution of studies across SRH focus areas: 30 (36%) provided evidence on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on access to or utilisation of contraceptive services,28 29 32 35 37 40 42 47 51–54 57 58 63 67 68 71 73 75 78 82 83 88 91 93 97 104 109 110 21 (25%) on abortion services,30 32–35 40 43 49–52 68 73 80 87 89 90 93 99 103 109 20 (24%) on GBV/IPV services28 31 36 38 39 45 46 48 74 76 77 81 84 86 98 101 102 105 107 109 and 33 (40%) on STI-related services 35 40 41 44 53 55–62 64–66 69–73 79 85 91–96 100 104 106 108 Figure 2. illustrates the distribution of studies among each of the four SRH service focus area by region and by study type.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations