HIV testing within general practices in Europe: a mixed-methods systematic review

Abstract

BackgroundLate diagnosis of HIV infection remains a key challenge in Europe. It is acknowledged that general practitioners (GPs) may contribute greatly to early case finding, yet there is evidence that many diagnostic opportunities are being missed. To further promote HIV testing in primary care and to increase the utility of available research, the existing evidence has been synthesised in a systematic review adhering to the PRISMA guidelines.MethodsThe databases PubMed, Scopus and Embase were searched for the period 2006–2017. Two authors judged independently on the eligibility of studies. Through a mixed-methods systematic review of 29 studies, we provide a description of HIV testing in general practices in Europe, including barriers and facilitators.ResultsThe findings of the study show that although various approaches to target patients are used by GPs, most tests are still carried out based on the patient’s request. Several barriers obstruct HIV testing in general practice. Included are a lack of communication skills on sexual health, lack of knowledge about HIV testing recommendations and epidemic specificities, difficulties with using the complete list of clinical HIV indicator diseases and lack of experience in delivering and communicating test results. The findings also suggest that the provision of specific training, practical tools and promotion programmes has an impact on the testing performance of GPs.ConclusionsGPs could have an increased role in provider-initiated HIV-testing for early case finding. To achieve this objective, solutions to the reported barriers should be identified and testing criteria adapted to primary healthcare defined. Providing guidance and training to better identify priority groups for HIV testing, as well as information on the HIV epidemic’s characteristics, will be fundamental to increasing awareness and testing by GPs.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-018-6107-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The role of mobility in sexual risk behaviour and HIV acquisition among sub-Saharan African migrants residing in two European cities

“…Migration status may be one of the structural factors impeding access [60,61], but future research should explore this finding in more detail. HIV screening programs should consider this policy-practice gap, and invest more in further reducing thresholds to health care and HIV testing through tailored community-based initiatives [62] or in primarycare settings [63], in particular for women and those being undocumented.…”

HIV testing strategies employed in health care settings in the European Union/European Economic Area (EU/EEA): evidence from a systematic review

“…However, the data also highlight that there is considerable room to increase the offer of testing in health care settings, particularly in primary care and emergency departments. Evidence from systematic reviews shows that, in primary care, barriers to testing are related to the clinician's knowledge [17,148], as well as the clinician's anxiety associated with raising the topic of HIV testing with patients [149]. Improving testing in primary care is important because in many countries more testing takes place in primary care than in specialized services, as those countries have a testing strategy that primarily uses GPs (e.g.…”

Evaluating a pilot process for reviewing late HIV diagnoses in England and Wales

“…A systematic review of barriers to HIV testing in primary care settings in Europe identified a lack of familiarity with testing guidelines and issues of communication about sexual health. 12 Other studies have also raised the following concerns in primary care: lack of time to conduct HIV tests, mischaracterisation of pretest counselling as complex and time-consuming, concerns around result management and the belief that HIV test results were best delivered by staff with specialised training. 13,14 However, there is evidence that provision of specific training, practical tools or an HIV testing promotion programme may improve HIV testing rates in general practice, particularly in areas of high prevalence.…”