2017
DOI: 10.1080/09540121.2017.1281876
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HIV rapid testing in the framework of an STI prevention project on a cohort of vulnerable Italians and immigrants

Abstract: Our study showed high acceptance of rapid test in this specific vulnerable population and this allowed to identify new HIV diagnoses in unaware people. Socioeconomic inequalities observed in the KAP questionnaire suggest the need for actions to support the reduction of cultural differences in knowledge of HIV/AIDS and for policies aimed at improving access to health services and preventions programmes of marginalized populations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
27
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Results also suggest that rapid testing is acceptable to both groups (patient studies, n = 5; provider studies, n = 6), with providers willing to use rapid tests and finding their interpretation easy . Some feasibility studies highlighted that nontraditional health care settings can target populations not previously tested for HIV ( n = 4) , with the reported percentage of first‐time testers in such settings ranging from 51 to 75%. One study suggested that provider‐initiated testing is unlikely to be acceptable when specific populations are targeted (in this case, sub‐Saharan African patients) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Results also suggest that rapid testing is acceptable to both groups (patient studies, n = 5; provider studies, n = 6), with providers willing to use rapid tests and finding their interpretation easy . Some feasibility studies highlighted that nontraditional health care settings can target populations not previously tested for HIV ( n = 4) , with the reported percentage of first‐time testers in such settings ranging from 51 to 75%. One study suggested that provider‐initiated testing is unlikely to be acceptable when specific populations are targeted (in this case, sub‐Saharan African patients) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Novel HIV testing technologies were employed by 40 studies in a wide range of clinical settings to increase testing coverage; the majority utilized rapid testing (n = 36) [18,19,22,24,25,34,36,45,46,[48][49][50]56,57,59,65,75,77,81,83,85,88,89,[99][100][101]107,113,117,129,132,134,137,139,141] while four utilized self-sampling (n = 3) [44,52,102] and self-testing strategies (n = 1) [108]. Two of the four self-sampling studies used oral fluid sampling while the self-test required a blood sample.…”
Section: Testing Provision Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In 2015, despite a decline during the past decade, migrants still constitute an important proportion (37%) of new HIV cases in the European Union and the European Economic Area. 14,15 Interestingly, there is an increasing evidence that some migrants acquire HIV after their arrival in Europe. 16 An Italian study demonstrated that a lower educational level and immigrant status are associated with poor knowledge about HIV, other STIs and prevention methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 An Italian study demonstrated that a lower educational level and immigrant status are associated with poor knowledge about HIV, other STIs and prevention methods. 15 Moreover, it revealed that immigrants have lower perception of sexual risk and higher prejudice than Italians. The risk of STIs and other infections is aggravated by the harsh or chaotic living conditions that many immigrants experience before emigration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%