2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-0484-2_7
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HIV Persistence on Antiretroviral Therapy and Barriers to a Cure

Abstract: HIV persists within the body despite successful suppression of virus replication with antiretroviral therapy (ART). HIV lurks in latent and active reservoirs, leading to rebound of virus spread if ART is interrupted. The latent HIV reservoir is a natural consequence of the life cycle of HIV, with integration of HIV into the genomes of cells that are or later enter the resting state, resulting in transcriptionally quiescent provirus. Resting CD4 T cells comprise the majority of the latent reservoir, although ne… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…KEYWORDS SIV, single-genome sequencing, genome intactness, genomic integrity, persistent viral reservoir V irus that persists despite long-term combination antiretroviral therapy (cART), including provirus in latently infected resting memory CD4 ϩ T cells, represents the primary barrier to more-definitive treatment of HIV infection (1)(2)(3). This reservoir has an extremely long half-life (4,5) such that even after years of cART and undetectable plasma viremia, treatment interruption almost invariably results in viral recrudescence (6)(7)(8)(9). Thus, a major goals in HIV cure research are to identify and eradicate the viral reservoir that contributes to rebound viremia or to reduce it to levels that can be sustainably controlled by the immune system, allowing the safe cessation of cART.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…KEYWORDS SIV, single-genome sequencing, genome intactness, genomic integrity, persistent viral reservoir V irus that persists despite long-term combination antiretroviral therapy (cART), including provirus in latently infected resting memory CD4 ϩ T cells, represents the primary barrier to more-definitive treatment of HIV infection (1)(2)(3). This reservoir has an extremely long half-life (4,5) such that even after years of cART and undetectable plasma viremia, treatment interruption almost invariably results in viral recrudescence (6)(7)(8)(9). Thus, a major goals in HIV cure research are to identify and eradicate the viral reservoir that contributes to rebound viremia or to reduce it to levels that can be sustainably controlled by the immune system, allowing the safe cessation of cART.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While many HIV LARs for use in "shock and kill" strategies to attack and deplete the reservoir of long term latently infected cells have been studied, none have really been proven to be clinically safe and effective [1][2][3][4][5][6]16,18,19]. This unfortunate experience suggests that it might be helpful to pursue mechanistically novel latency activation technologies for use in "shock and kill."…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) can effectively control disease in a patient infected with HIV-1, cART does not cure a patient of the infection, due to the existence of a persistent reservoir of long-lived latently infected cells, largely CD4+ memory T cells (recently reviewed in [1][2][3][4]). Considerable interest has centered on developing ways to attack, deplete, and ideally eliminate the long-lived reservoir of latently infected cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CD4 T cells, cells of the myeloid lineage (monocytes and macrophages) and dendritic cells [42][43][44][45]. Monocytes and macrophages are considered one of the most suitable cells for studying viral latency due to their long lifespan, as well as their ubiquitous presence throughout the body, including the brain [43,45,46]. EVs derived from monocytes and macrophages potentially have a profound effect on recipient cells [47,48].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%