2016
DOI: 10.1089/lgbt.2015.0065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HIV-Negative Partnered Men's Willingness to Use Non-Occupational Post-Exposure Prophylaxis and Associated Factors in a U.S. Sample of HIV-Negative and HIV-Discordant Male Couples

Abstract: Efforts should be made to increase male couples' awareness of nPEP and how to access nPEP. Uptake of nPEP has the potential to help avert new HIV infections among male couples.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…nPEP awareness was documented in 60.2% of participants, a similar rate to the 64% reported in MSM surveyed in three eastern Australian states ( n =16,022) [18] . However, a study of 176 US HIV-negative MSM in 2011 showed that only 28% of them had heard of it, which was much lower than in the present study [15] . In contrast, a very high proportion (82.3%) of Italian MSM ( n =1874) in 2014 had knowledge about nPEP [19] .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…nPEP awareness was documented in 60.2% of participants, a similar rate to the 64% reported in MSM surveyed in three eastern Australian states ( n =16,022) [18] . However, a study of 176 US HIV-negative MSM in 2011 showed that only 28% of them had heard of it, which was much lower than in the present study [15] . In contrast, a very high proportion (82.3%) of Italian MSM ( n =1874) in 2014 had knowledge about nPEP [19] .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 92%
“…Similarly, Mitchell et al . assessed the willingness and associated factors to take nPEP among 275 HIV-negative MSM and 58 HIV-discordant male couples in the USA and showed that 73% were extremely likely to use it if they had had unprotected sex with an HIV-positive individual [15] . Previous experience with nPEP in our study was 7%, which is higher than among MSM in the USA (3.2%) in 2013 [16] and Canada (3%) in 2016 [17] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite potential benefits, the provision of nPEP remains underutilized because of the cost to patients. [ 48 ] In our study, 9 MSM gave up treatment since they could not afford the nPEP cost. Overall, half the participants selected the relatively inexpensive regimen of “TDF/FTC” ($ 286.96).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Different from this study, a study in the United States revealed that men whose annual individual income less than $30,000 were more likely to use nPEP compared to those with high income. However, it was noteworthy that health insurance could often cover the costs of nPEP drug in US and their data also suggested that those with lower incomes might have difficulty in paying for nPEP without financial support [25]. It reminded us that we ought to take the income levels of drug users in different areas into account when drafting the price of nPEP.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%