2022
DOI: 10.1097/coh.0000000000000771
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HIV cure: an acceptability scientific agenda

Abstract: Purpose of review Recent years have seen major investments into HIV cure research, seeking a permanent cure or remission. The purpose of this review is to consider how this important research agenda could be broadened to include issues of acceptability and appropriateness for different populations. Recent findings We discuss how the definitions of cure such as functional cure (remission) or complete cure (viral elimination) could be interpreted differently by various popula… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 66 publications
(94 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a high bar for cure that researchers need to take note of as they design cure modalities. The expectation of complete viral elimination is not unique to Ghanaian healthcare providers as patients and providers in other settings find it difficult to grasp the concept of functional cure [ 24 ]. This means that more studies using robust methods such as choice experiments and human centered designs are needed to explore the concept of an HIV functional cure in both patients and providers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a high bar for cure that researchers need to take note of as they design cure modalities. The expectation of complete viral elimination is not unique to Ghanaian healthcare providers as patients and providers in other settings find it difficult to grasp the concept of functional cure [ 24 ]. This means that more studies using robust methods such as choice experiments and human centered designs are needed to explore the concept of an HIV functional cure in both patients and providers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%