1993
DOI: 10.1038/364679b0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HIV and multidrug resistance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…V106A causes Ͼ30-fold resistance to nevirapine, intermediate resistance to delavirdine, and low-level resistance to efavirenz (18,38,95,108,220,284,290,418). L100I causes intermediate resistance to efavirenz and delavirdine and low-level resistance to nevirapine (37, 38,108,290,403,418).…”
Section: Nnrti Mutations Between Codons 98 and 108mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…V106A causes Ͼ30-fold resistance to nevirapine, intermediate resistance to delavirdine, and low-level resistance to efavirenz (18,38,95,108,220,284,290,418). L100I causes intermediate resistance to efavirenz and delavirdine and low-level resistance to nevirapine (37, 38,108,290,403,418).…”
Section: Nnrti Mutations Between Codons 98 and 108mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One concern is that HIV-1 may develop multidrug resistance. Indeed, recombinant viruses containing multiple mutations introduced by site-directed mutagenesis show resistance to multiple drugs in vitro (14). However, the emergence of multidrug resistance of HIV-1 in patients receiving combination chemotherapy remains to be studied.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretically this should prevent the development of multi-drug resistance (Chow et al, 1993). It appears, however, that multi-drug-resistant variants can still be selected during such combination therapy (Emini et al, 1993;Larder et al, 1993). Divergent therapy, the more conventional approach for combination regimens, uses antiviral agents that have different mechanisms of action, do not share cross-resistance, and have different dose-limiting toxicities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%