The result is the 33 chapters of the Palgrave Handbook of Power, Gender, and Psychology. Most authors spontaneously grounded their contribution in history and then used psychology to interrogate uses of power, trusted people to serve as the experts of their lives, stressed the importance of structure and systemic change over individuals' resistance, and heralded the centrality of intersectionality in exposing how power plays out for individuals and groups across diverse social categories and thus serves as the fuel for inequality. The overarching caution that emerges is that by decontextualizing people's lives and by taking a largely individualistic perspective, feminist psychologists run the risk of ignoring the power of gendered power, that is, how power and gender are co-constructed.Interestingly, no single definition of power guides the contributors. Rather, authors frame power within their own subfield of expertise and convincingly explicate its effects. Some authors focus on power at broad, macroscopic levels. For example, Elizabeth Cole concludes that intersectionality is not about race, class, and gender per se, but rather about racism, capitalism, and sexism, that is, processes of power. Lauren Duncan insightfully expands traditional conceptualizations of power as power-over (coercion) and power-to (empowerment) to include power-with: solidarity to take collective action to improve the status of a group that is motivated by identity, injustice, and efficacy. Heather Bullock and Melina Singh call for a shift in attention away from tacitly deficient people living in poverty toward exposing inequality, power, and class exploitation.In other chapters, authors center the individual but always, and importantly, within context. For example, Rachel Robnett and Kristin Vierra examine how gender and power ORCID iD