1992
DOI: 10.1089/aid.1992.8.1749
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HIV-1 Tropism: Truth or Consequences?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1993
1993
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, Layne et al demonstrated that the cell influences infection kinetics and physical properties generally attributed to the virus (34). In subsequent letters, Tsai et al (58) and Nara et al (41) have drawn on the evidence presented by Layne and others to highlight the often overlooked influence of the cell in experiments used to draw conclusions about viral tropism and susceptibility to inhibition. In contrast, Turner et al found no difference in susceptibility to soluble CD4 blocking when assays were carried out in parallel in PBMCs and the cell line C8166 (59).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Layne et al demonstrated that the cell influences infection kinetics and physical properties generally attributed to the virus (34). In subsequent letters, Tsai et al (58) and Nara et al (41) have drawn on the evidence presented by Layne and others to highlight the often overlooked influence of the cell in experiments used to draw conclusions about viral tropism and susceptibility to inhibition. In contrast, Turner et al found no difference in susceptibility to soluble CD4 blocking when assays were carried out in parallel in PBMCs and the cell line C8166 (59).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%