2020
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HIV-1 Tat Length: Comparative and Functional Considerations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previously, we confirmed that ultrapure Tat protein or short PTD-Tat (47-57 amino acids) was entering into neuronal cells or nucleus as early as after 40 minutes post-treatment [37,38]. Our and other research groups investigated features and characteristics of Tat protein to achieve an efficient transduction and to avoid degradation or cleavage prior its transportation into nucleus [39][40][41][42][43].…”
Section: Mitochondrial Dna Damage In Human Primary Neuronal Cells Induced By Recombinant Hiv-1 Tat Peptide or Adenoviral Vprsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Previously, we confirmed that ultrapure Tat protein or short PTD-Tat (47-57 amino acids) was entering into neuronal cells or nucleus as early as after 40 minutes post-treatment [37,38]. Our and other research groups investigated features and characteristics of Tat protein to achieve an efficient transduction and to avoid degradation or cleavage prior its transportation into nucleus [39][40][41][42][43].…”
Section: Mitochondrial Dna Damage In Human Primary Neuronal Cells Induced By Recombinant Hiv-1 Tat Peptide or Adenoviral Vprsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…There are multiple splice variants of tat, and the most studied version is a truncated tat 1–86. A recent meta-analysis uncovered that 40% of the 973 studies examining Tat used the 1–86 variant, while only 15.5% used Tat 1–101, which is the most common splice variant observed in people infected with HIV-1 subtype B [ 97 ]. This suggests that one should exercise some caution when considering studies using tat 1–86 or other truncated forms of tat.…”
Section: Synapodendritic Damage and Neuronal Activity Changes In Hand Experimental Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that one should exercise some caution when considering studies using tat 1–86 or other truncated forms of tat. Indeed, there are functional differences reported between tat splice variants that may contribute to synaptodendritic injury in HAND, and common tat-transgenic animal models typically do not express the full-length tat 1–101 [ 97 ]. That said, tat 1–86 exposure in animal models does affect dendritic spines and neuronal function in brain regions including the hippocampus, cortex, and striatum.…”
Section: Synapodendritic Damage and Neuronal Activity Changes In Hand Experimental Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The near-perfect accuracy, PPV and NPV for this analysis is consistent with a protease cleavage site between residues 57-58, which is also an exon boundary, and previous observations support similar truncation tolerance for longer trucations. [16][17][18]34,35 However, almost any missense mutation from S46-E86 was tolerated, which is not consistent with the truncation mutants tolerated up to R57. The region of difference (S46-R57) contains a nuclear localization motif, and binding sites for Importinb, P53, and EGR.…”
Section: Intragenic Epistasis Of Tat Double Mutantsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…[16][17][18] Truncations mutants of less than 58 amino acids from the start Met were considered true negatives, while those 58 amino acids or longer were considered true positives. [16][17][18] Although not designed, due to errors in synthetic oligonucleotide synthesis we observed barcodes for Tat truncation mutants less than 58 amino acids long (n = 70), which were expected to be negatives, and truncation mutants that were longer than 58 amino acids (n = 8) which were expected to be positives with wild type activity (Supplementary File S3). Comparing the Tat mutant activities in LentiX293T to the true controls produced perfect GigaAssay performance statistics for: accuracy = 1.0; sensitivity = 1.0, specificity = 1.0; PPV = 1.0; and NPV = 1.0 (Fig.…”
Section: Gigaassay Performance Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%