HIV-1-specific antibody responses during acute and chronic HIV-1 infection

Abstract

Purpose of review The humoral immune response to HIV-1 throughout infection is comprised of complex mixtures of antibody isotypes with numerous HIV-1 specificities. However, unlike antibody responses to most infections, protective antibody responses are delayed and do not arise until long after HIV-1 latency is established. We review recent data on HIV-1-specific antibody isotypes induced following HIV-1 transmission: to understand the effects of HIV-1 on B cell and T cell effector responses, to understand the timing of the rise and fall of different anti-HIV-1 antibodies and to understand how antibodies could contribute to protective immunity if they were either pre-existing or elicited immediately after HIV-1 transmission. Recent findings Studies of the earliest events following infection by the transmitted/founder virus have recently revealed that early destruction of B cell generative microenvironments may be responsible for delay of potentially protective anti-HIV-1 antibody responses. Unlike the initial CD8+ T cell response to HIV-1, the initial induced antibody response is usually ineffective in controlling virus replication during acute HIV-1 infection. Summary The antibody isotypes and specificities elicited during HIV-1 infection can provide a window into deciphering the detrimental effects of HIV-1 on B cell and T cell responses. Additionally, further characterization of the virus inhibitory capabilities of anti-HIV-1 antibody isotypes can define the spectrum of potential protective HIV-1 antibodies that could be readily elicited by experimental vaccines and adjuvants.

B cells in early and chronic HIV infection: evidence for preservation of immune function associated with early initiation of antiretroviral therapy

“…45 However, memory B-cell responses are also important to consider, both for vaccine development and ability of the immune system to control HIV in infected individuals. Several studies have demonstrated that the maintenance of HIV-specific antibodies and memory B cells is dependent on the presence of HIV antigen.…”

A Cytokine Pattern That Differentiates Preseroconversion From Postseroconversion Phases of Primary HIV Infection

“…Modulation of these cytokines might promote an earlier development of autologous neutralizing antibodies that may contribute to faster and long-lasting control of HIV. 35,36 …”

The HIV Seronegative Window Period: Diagnostic Challenges and Solutions

“…There has been much work published using the 2 nd route (Myron S. Cohen 2007;Margoli 2009), albeit they offer us a view into the post active viremia stage, leaving us in the dark as to the earliest days post infection. Such studies (Tomaras and Haynes 2009) have revealed that there is early destruction of B cell generative microenvironment, and that this might be one of the causes for a delay in protective anti HIV antibody responses (Richman et al 2003;Davis et al 2009;Stacey et al 2009) and other parameters of antibody response (Tomaras et al 2008). Polyclonal cell activation in early HIV infection and loss of gut germinal centres have been observed (Levesque et al 2009).…”