2019
DOI: 10.1101/838912
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HIV-1 Envelope and MPER antibody structures in lipid assemblies

Abstract: SummaryStructural and functional studies of HIV Env as a transmembrane protein have long been complicated by challenges associated with inherent flexibility of the molecule and the membrane-embedded hydrophobic regions. Thus, most structural studies have utilized soluble forms where the regions C-terminal to the ectodomain are deleted. Here, we present approaches for incorporating full-length, wild-type HIV-1 Env, as well as C-terminally truncated and stabilized versions, into … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
27
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
(95 reference statements)
7
27
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Ample structural data suggest that the current structures of the Env ectodomain based on the SOSIP design [ 5 , 6 ] represent the native Env prefusion conformation [ 7 , 8 , 9 ]. The conformation observed in Env SOSIP structures is in agreement with medium resolution structures of membrane-bound Env [ 10 ] and membrane-anchored Env solubilized in detergent or nanodiscs [ 11 , 12 , 13 ]. In addition, an alternative conformation that precedes the SOSIP conformation has been proposed to explain some discrepancies on antibody binding to membrane-anchored versus soluble Env [ 14 , 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Ample structural data suggest that the current structures of the Env ectodomain based on the SOSIP design [ 5 , 6 ] represent the native Env prefusion conformation [ 7 , 8 , 9 ]. The conformation observed in Env SOSIP structures is in agreement with medium resolution structures of membrane-bound Env [ 10 ] and membrane-anchored Env solubilized in detergent or nanodiscs [ 11 , 12 , 13 ]. In addition, an alternative conformation that precedes the SOSIP conformation has been proposed to explain some discrepancies on antibody binding to membrane-anchored versus soluble Env [ 14 , 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…MPER is likely sterically occluded within native Env and only accessible upon initial receptor-induced conformational changes [ 79 , 80 ]. Nevertheless, a first encounter complex can be formed with native Env, which however induces conformational changes to facilitate access to the epitope [ 11 , 12 ]. MPER bnAb-Env structures [ 11 , 12 ] suggest further that trimeric MPER [ 64 ] needs to “open” up to accommodate bnAb binding.…”
Section: Neutralizing Antibodies Targeting Gp41 Mpermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our data, thus, indicate that MPER antibodies can act all along the gp41 refolding pathway from blocking initial conformations of close to native Env [68][69][70] up to a late fusion intermediate state that has already pulled viral and cellular membranes into close apposition. This thus, opens a long temporal window of action for MPER bnAbs consistent with the findings that the half-life of neutralization of MPER bnAbs is up to 30 minutes post virus exposure to target cells 71,72 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Mutagenesis of CRAC resulted in a reduced infection rate and a slowing of the viral life cycle 34 . Notably, epitopes for the 2F5, 4E10, 10E8 and LN01 broadly neutralizing antibodies against HIV include locations of the MPER and knowing more about its structure bears considerable promise for the rational design of an AIDS vaccine [35][36][37][38][39][40] .…”
Section: Tfementioning
confidence: 99%