Hitting and Missing Targets by Ambulance Services for Emergency Calls: Effects of Different Systems of Performance Measurement within the UK

Abstract

OnlineOpen: This article is available free online at www.blackwell-synergy.com Summary. Following devolution, differences developed between UK countries in systems of measuring performance against a common target that ambulance services ought to respond to 75% of calls for what may be immediately life threatening emergencies (category A calls) within 8 minutes. Only in England was this target integral to a ranking system of 'star rating', which inflicted reputational damage on services that failed to hit targets, and only in England has this target been met. In other countries, the target has been missed by such large margins that services would have been publicly reported as failing, if they had been covered by the English system of star ratings. The paper argues that this case-study adds to evidence from comparisons of different systems of hospital performance measurement that, to have an effect, these systems need to be designed to inflict reputational damage on those that have performed poorly; and it explores implications of this hypothesis. The paper also asks questions about the adequacy of systems of performance measurement of ambulance services in UK countries.

The impact of the 4 h target on patient care and outcomes in the Emergency Department: an analysis of hospital incidence data

“…Few other studies have looked at the impact of government-set time targets in healthcare and the majority of previous work has concentrated on examining the impact in terms of achievement of the target from a management perspective 6 9 17 18 20–23. All found that once a target was set, especially one accompanied by financial and/or punitive incentives, effort was expended to ensure it was met.…”

Different cultures of management and their relationships with organizational performance: evidence from the UK ambulance service

“…Performance ratings in the NHS were seen as poor measures, which often neglected areas of excellence in poorly-rated organizations and pockets of failure in excellent institutions (Bevan and Hood, 2006). In the case of ambulance service, several unintended consequences of performance targets have been documented, some of which were the result of the underlying cultures in the ambulance service (Bevan and Hamblin, 2009;Wankhade, 2011).…”

Inching toward Incrementalism: Federalism, Devolution, and Health Policy in the United States and the United Kingdom

“…Throughout, however, there has been especial emphasis on targets, in particular for the reduction of hospital waiting times and improved responsiveness of ambulance services (Bevan and Hamblin 2009;Connolly, Bevan, and Mays 2010). These policies involve severe penalties and attractive rewards for failure and success.…”