2013
DOI: 10.1139/bcb-2013-0059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hitchhiker antigens: Inconsistent ChIP results, questionable immunohistology data, and poor antibody performance may have a common factor

Abstract: Questionable data and poor antibody performance may have a common factor: antigens "hitchhiking" on the very antibodies designed to target them. Here I focus on histone hitchhikers and their antibodies, given the impact of chromatin immunoprecipitation on our understanding of DNA regulation. Caused by a lack of stringency during antibody purification, hitchhikers will impede important advances in chromatin research and therapeutics derived from that research, if similar circumstances in the study of lupus deca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results, yet again [29,55,58,59], emphasise the need for critical examination and extensive testing of antibodies prior to their experimental usage. Whenever possible, controls in ChIP-seq experiments should be performed by ChIP-ing of protein in a system where the protein is not physically present, as implemented in Knockout Implemented Normalization method (KOIN) [60].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Our results, yet again [29,55,58,59], emphasise the need for critical examination and extensive testing of antibodies prior to their experimental usage. Whenever possible, controls in ChIP-seq experiments should be performed by ChIP-ing of protein in a system where the protein is not physically present, as implemented in Knockout Implemented Normalization method (KOIN) [60].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…and the methods used for data analysis (e.g., peak calling). Third, ChIP-seq data contain numerous technical biases (Kidder et al, 2011), including formaldehyde crosslinking bias (Solomon and Varshavsky, 1985; Lu et al, 2010; Gavrilov et al, 2015), antibody specificity and variability problems (Parseghian, 2013; Schonbrunn, 2014; Wardle and Tan, 2015) (Figure S15), technical artifacts due to highly expressed regions of the genome (which are not corrected by regular input controls) (Teytelman et al, 2013; Park et al, 2013; Jain et al, 2015), bias due to genome fragmentation and PCR amplification (Bardet et al, 2011; Poptsova et al, 2014), etc. These biases can lead to false-positive and false-negative peaks, and they also significantly affect any quantitative estimates of in vivo TF binding levels derived from ChIP-seq data, in ways that we do not understand well enough to correct (Gavrilov et al, 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that the total IgG purified on PtG sorbents is enriched by immune complexes and contains a lot of so-called “hitchhiker” ligands [42, 43]. We believe that this phenomenon is akin to the HAbs formation or is closely related to it, and many hitchhikers unidentified and untested as yet may be present in HAbs, including TF-positive ligands of tumor origin such as MUC1 which is overexpressed and aberrantly glycosylated in cancer, and identified as an antigenic component in IgG immune complexes in cancer patients [44, 45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%