History of shoulder instability surgery

Randelli, Pietro; Cucchi, Davide; Butt, Usman Ismat

doi:10.1007/s00167-015-3947-3

Cited by 25 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 173 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Another interesting finding presented in our study was the spike of publications in 2007 (9) and 2005 (7) and the majority of the most cited articles being published after 2000. Barbera et al 32 found a similar trend among the most-cited articles in hip arthroscopy.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 59%

“…6,7 Further advancements were made through the 1980s and 1990s in the treatment of shoulder instability, including arthroscopic Bankart repair. [8][9][10] Since then, arthroscopic management for a variety of shoulder pathologies has continued to advance and the indications for shoulder arthroscopy have rapidly expanded to include management of shoulder instability, fractures of the humerus and glenoid, rotator cuff repair, and many other soft-tissue pathologies. 3 The development of shoulder arthroscopy has been rapid, and it is increasingly difficult for clinicians to stay up to date with the current state of the literature and its evolution over the past 4 decades.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Top 50 Most-Cited Shoulder Arthroscopy Studies

Moore

Pollock

McQuivey

et al. 2021

Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose To determine the 50 most frequently cited studies in the orthopaedic shoulder arthroscopy literature and to conduct a bibliometric analysis of these studies. Methods The Clarivate Analytics Web of Knowledge database was used to gather data and metrics using Boolean queries to capture all possible iterations of shoulder arthroscopy research. The search list was sorted so that articles were organized in descending order based on the number of citations and included or excluded based on relevance to shoulder arthroscopy. The information extracted for each article included author name, publication year, country of origin, journal name, article type, and the level of evidence. Results For these 50 studies, the total number of citations was calculated to be 13,910, with an average of 278.2 citations per paper. The most-cited article was cited 1134 times, whereas the second- and third-most cited articles were cited 920 and 745 times, respectively. All 50 articles were published in English and came from 7 different orthopaedic journals. The United States was responsible for most of the included articles (31), followed by France (9) and Japan (3). Conclusions The majority of the most-cited articles in shoulder arthroscopy are case series and descriptive studies originating from the United States. In addition, more than one half of the top 50 most-cited studies were published after 2004, which suggests that article age may be less important in the accumulation of citations for a rapidly growing field like shoulder arthroscopy. Clinical Relevance The top 50 most-cited studies list will provide researchers, medical students, residents, and fellows with a foundational list of the most important and influential academic contributions to shoulder arthroscopy.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 59%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Top 50 Most-Cited Shoulder Arthroscopy Studies

Moore

Pollock

McQuivey

et al. 2021

Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The long-term outcomes following arthroscopic Bankart repair are diverse and still controversial. Although the increasing popularity of arthroscopic procedures is well documented, 32 even the same “arthroscopic Bankart repair” has evolved over time with the development of arthroscopic techniques and technologies 25 . Importantly, most published long-term (ie, >10 years) outcomes studies of arthroscopic Bankart repair are from cases performed before the year 2000.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Long-term outcomes following isolated arthroscopic Bankart repair: a 9- to 12-year follow-up

Herrera

Woodmass

et al. 2019

JSES Open Access

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundThe long-term outcomes following arthroscopic Bankart repair have been rarely reported. Because of its relative novelty, little is known about recurrent instability, postoperative arthritis, and patient satisfaction, particularly for well-established modern procedures. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes following arthroscopic Bankart repair.MethodsPatients who underwent isolated arthroscopic Bankart repair from 2003 to 2006 were retrospectively reviewed. Recurrent instability, radiographic, and clinical scores (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES], Simple Shoulder Test [SST], and Rowe scores) were evaluated. Patient factors (ie, age, gender, side, number of instability episodes, contact sports, and bone loss) were analyzed to determine the correlation with outcome measures.ResultsAmong the 98 patients (102 shoulders), we were able to contact 50 patients (51 shoulders, mean age 27.0 years, mean follow-up 121.2 months). Significant bone loss in glenoid and humerus was arthroscopically observed in 16 (31.4%) and 28 (54.9%) shoulders, respectively. Sixteen shoulders (31.4%) experienced recurrent instability. Recent radiographs were obtained for 38 shoulders, 14 (36.8%) of which showed moderate to severe arthritis. Clinical outcomes at follow-up were 89.3, 10.8, and 76.0 for ASES, SST, and Rowe scores, respectively. Neither recurrent instability nor arthritis was correlated with any patient factors.ConclusionWhen isolated arthroscopic Bankart repair was used in all patients with shoulder instability regardless of bony defect, postoperative recurrent instability and arthritis rates were unacceptably high. Additional procedures should be chosen after careful consideration of multiple patient factors.

show abstract

“…Arthroscopic techniques have enormously altered the landscape of shoulder stabilization surgery [5]. Although shoulder arthroscopy was first introduced by Samuel Burman in 1931, it was only in 1980 that the first arthroscopic stabilization procedure was described [5,6]. Since then, rapid strides have been made and increasingly sophisticated arthroscopic techniques have been published which continue to evolve constantly (Table 1).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Morgan and Bodenstab [9] published their case series of arthroscopic Bankart repair using transglenoid suture fixation of anterior labrum. Use of suture anchors for labral repair was popularised Wolf and Snyder in the early 1990s [5,10].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Innovative Approaches in the Management of Shoulder Instability: Current Concept Review

John

Wong

2019

Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose of Review This article summarises the latest innovations and concepts in the management of shoulder instability associated with glenoid bone loss. Recent Findings The management of shoulder instability has undergone significant evolution in the last century with rapid strides being made in the last few decades due to the transition from open to arthroscopic techniques allowing management of pathological entities which were previously untreatable. However, there is no consensus on treatment methods, especially in the presence of glenoid bone loss. The complication profile associated with non-anatomic glenoid bony reconstruction procedures has triggered research for alternate techniques using free bone grafts. Open Latarjet procedure continues to be the gold standard in the face of glenoid bone loss; however, arthroscopic anatomic glenoid reconstruction with bone block grafts is gaining in popularity and is associated with excellent short-term clinico-radiologic outcomes. Summary Arthroscopic anatomic glenoid reconstruction using bone grafts has been proposed as an alternative to the complex allarthroscopic Latarjet procedure with excellent short-term results, minimal complications and a relatively easier learning curve. Capsular reconstruction has emerged as option for the management of instability with poor quality or absent capsular tissue. Future long-term outcome studies and randomised comparative trials will determine if these innovations stand the test of time.

show abstract

History of shoulder instability surgery

Abstract: IV.

Cited by 25 publications

References 173 publications

The Top 50 Most-Cited Shoulder Arthroscopy Studies

The Top 50 Most-Cited Shoulder Arthroscopy Studies

Long-term outcomes following isolated arthroscopic Bankart repair: a 9- to 12-year follow-up

Innovative Approaches in the Management of Shoulder Instability: Current Concept Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About