2008
DOI: 10.1159/000151611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

History of Research on Avian Influenza

Abstract: This chapter on the history of avian influenza viruses starts at the beginning of the 20th century with the description of early fundamental experiments on the characterization and replication of fowl plague virus before it was recognized as an influenza A virus. Virus replication is explained using molecular approaches, and the importance of the cleavability of the hemagglutinin for starting the infection, for pathogenicity, organ tropism, and outbreaks is a central theme. The role of host factors for specifi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Certain parallels are apparent between the 1918 and 2009 pandemics, especially the possible role of swine as an intermediate host. The role of swine as a mixing vessel of different lineages, an important feature of the 2009 Swine-origin virus (Smith et al 2009b ), is less clear with the ‘Spanish flu’ pandemic; while we find limited evidence that the 1918 human pandemic was the result of a human/swine reassortment, Scholtissek ( 2008 ) and Smith et al ( 2009a ) both argue that this might have occurred for some of the segments. The possibility that the 2009 pandemic virus might increase in pathogenicity emphasizes the importance of understanding how the 1918 virus emerged and the basis of its extreme pathogenicity.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…Certain parallels are apparent between the 1918 and 2009 pandemics, especially the possible role of swine as an intermediate host. The role of swine as a mixing vessel of different lineages, an important feature of the 2009 Swine-origin virus (Smith et al 2009b ), is less clear with the ‘Spanish flu’ pandemic; while we find limited evidence that the 1918 human pandemic was the result of a human/swine reassortment, Scholtissek ( 2008 ) and Smith et al ( 2009a ) both argue that this might have occurred for some of the segments. The possibility that the 2009 pandemic virus might increase in pathogenicity emphasizes the importance of understanding how the 1918 virus emerged and the basis of its extreme pathogenicity.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…In addition, our reconstruction of the sequence of the virus at the host-shift event shows that the host-shift proteins were avian like in their human adaptedness, suggesting that there was little evidence of preadaptation. Although we cannot rule out the possibility that the 1918 pandemic virus evolved in humans for a significant period of time prior to the subsequent pandemic, the similarity of avian and porcine cell receptors, the observed successful avian-to-swine host shift in 1979 compared with the lack of precedent for a successful avian-to-human shift, and the difficulty in the virus existing undetected for so long in the human population argue for swine as an intermediate host ( Scholtissek 2008 ; dos Reis et al 2009 ; Smith, Bahl, et al 2009 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%