Abstract:of absorption at time t, V is the volume of distribution, C is the plasma drug concentration at time t and k is the first-order elimination rate constant. In 1937, Teorell, a Swedish physiologist and biophysicist, published two remarkable articles which many now attribute as being the foundations of modern pharmacokinetics (Teorell, 1937a,b). The model of Teorell was one of the first physiologically-based
“…PK studies in animals were routinely used by drug discovery projects before the development and validation of predictive in vitro tools. It is possible that the use of PK studies today is influenced by that legacy, and strategies have not fully evolved to reflect the power of predictive tools currently available [1,2].Although the fundamentals of what we would now recognize as pharmacokinetic theory and analysis were established by 1960 [3], it took another 20 years before PK studies started to become integral to the drug discovery process [4]. There were four keys steps that made PK optimization an achievable medicinal chemistry goal, thrusting drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics to the heart of discovery projects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although the fundamentals of what we would now recognize as pharmacokinetic theory and analysis were established by 1960 [3], it took another 20 years before PK studies started to become integral to the drug discovery process [4]. There were four keys steps that made PK optimization an achievable medicinal chemistry goal, thrusting drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics to the heart of discovery projects.…”
The optimization of lead compounds into clinical candidates is a complex process involving in vitro and in vivo data, and computational models, both for exploiting structure-activity relationships, and for translating observed properties to the clinic. Characterizing exposure in animals in both efficacy and toxicity studies is a key part of this translation, but pharmacokinetic (PK) studies in animals have also become a routine component of project workflows. PK studies in animals were routinely used by drug discovery projects before the development and validation of predictive in vitro tools. It is possible that the use of PK studies today is influenced by that legacy, and strategies have not fully evolved to reflect the power of predictive tools currently available [1,2].Although the fundamentals of what we would now recognize as pharmacokinetic theory and analysis were established by 1960 [3], it took another 20 years before PK studies started to become integral to the drug discovery process [4]. There were four keys steps that made PK optimization an achievable medicinal chemistry goal, thrusting drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics to the heart of discovery projects. The key steps in approximate chronological order were: bioanalytical: development of the thermospray interface enabling the coupling of HPLC and triple quadrupole mass spectrometers [5]; mathematical: the development of clearance concepts in pharmacokinetics, allowing AUC to be derived from dose, and rate of elimination from drug concentrations [6]; experimental: development of in vitro metabolizing systems, enabling prediction of clearance from animal and human liver preparations [7]; conceptual: the realization that drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics (DMPK) properties were driven by physicochemical and chemical properties and were therefore predictable and readily amenable to optimization [8]. With these developments not only was the need for DMPK in drug design readily recognizable, but the practical steps to deliver a cost-effective and efficient process were in place.By definition, pharmacokinetic studies conducted in drug discovery are conducted in animals. This begs the question that merits a clear, robust answer, for ethical and scientific reasons, 'why conduct pharmacokinetic studies in animals?'Typical pharmacokinetic studies in drug discovery are conducted in rats, less commonly in mice and dogs, at low doses (1-3 mg/kg) by the intravenous route, supplemented with oral administration, ideally utilizing a clinically relevant formulation. Tens of thousands of compounds are probably studied by the industry in this way, each year. To what end? Should compounds be selected using this data? Almost certainly not. Can the data be used in drug design? Rarely. Should the assay form part of a screening cascade to identify compounds for further testing? Only with caution.With the number and range of DMPK assays available to the modern pharmaceu-The role of pharmacokinetic studies in drug discovery: where are we now, how did we get here and wher...
“…PK studies in animals were routinely used by drug discovery projects before the development and validation of predictive in vitro tools. It is possible that the use of PK studies today is influenced by that legacy, and strategies have not fully evolved to reflect the power of predictive tools currently available [1,2].Although the fundamentals of what we would now recognize as pharmacokinetic theory and analysis were established by 1960 [3], it took another 20 years before PK studies started to become integral to the drug discovery process [4]. There were four keys steps that made PK optimization an achievable medicinal chemistry goal, thrusting drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics to the heart of discovery projects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although the fundamentals of what we would now recognize as pharmacokinetic theory and analysis were established by 1960 [3], it took another 20 years before PK studies started to become integral to the drug discovery process [4]. There were four keys steps that made PK optimization an achievable medicinal chemistry goal, thrusting drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics to the heart of discovery projects.…”
The optimization of lead compounds into clinical candidates is a complex process involving in vitro and in vivo data, and computational models, both for exploiting structure-activity relationships, and for translating observed properties to the clinic. Characterizing exposure in animals in both efficacy and toxicity studies is a key part of this translation, but pharmacokinetic (PK) studies in animals have also become a routine component of project workflows. PK studies in animals were routinely used by drug discovery projects before the development and validation of predictive in vitro tools. It is possible that the use of PK studies today is influenced by that legacy, and strategies have not fully evolved to reflect the power of predictive tools currently available [1,2].Although the fundamentals of what we would now recognize as pharmacokinetic theory and analysis were established by 1960 [3], it took another 20 years before PK studies started to become integral to the drug discovery process [4]. There were four keys steps that made PK optimization an achievable medicinal chemistry goal, thrusting drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics to the heart of discovery projects. The key steps in approximate chronological order were: bioanalytical: development of the thermospray interface enabling the coupling of HPLC and triple quadrupole mass spectrometers [5]; mathematical: the development of clearance concepts in pharmacokinetics, allowing AUC to be derived from dose, and rate of elimination from drug concentrations [6]; experimental: development of in vitro metabolizing systems, enabling prediction of clearance from animal and human liver preparations [7]; conceptual: the realization that drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics (DMPK) properties were driven by physicochemical and chemical properties and were therefore predictable and readily amenable to optimization [8]. With these developments not only was the need for DMPK in drug design readily recognizable, but the practical steps to deliver a cost-effective and efficient process were in place.By definition, pharmacokinetic studies conducted in drug discovery are conducted in animals. This begs the question that merits a clear, robust answer, for ethical and scientific reasons, 'why conduct pharmacokinetic studies in animals?'Typical pharmacokinetic studies in drug discovery are conducted in rats, less commonly in mice and dogs, at low doses (1-3 mg/kg) by the intravenous route, supplemented with oral administration, ideally utilizing a clinically relevant formulation. Tens of thousands of compounds are probably studied by the industry in this way, each year. To what end? Should compounds be selected using this data? Almost certainly not. Can the data be used in drug design? Rarely. Should the assay form part of a screening cascade to identify compounds for further testing? Only with caution.With the number and range of DMPK assays available to the modern pharmaceu-The role of pharmacokinetic studies in drug discovery: where are we now, how did we get here and wher...
“…As reviewed by Wagner,22) and Rowland and Tozer, 23) pharmacokinetics is a kinetic method advanced from classical kinetic theory applied to study drugs and toxins, and is useful for diagnosis and therapeutic treatments. In pharmacokinetics, the kinetic processes of the drug in the body are simply divided into five steps referred to as ADME, that is, absorption (A), distribution (D), metabolism (M) and excretion (E), and assumed usually to be a linear first-order reaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, no one has examined absolute calcium bioavailability using modern pharmacokinetics, even though Yergey et al 19) indicated theoretically that the fractional absorption using dual-isotope approaches are closely related to the concept of absolute bioavailability defined from pharmacokinetics. 22,23) To examine different calcium supplements, the absorbability of various calcium salts has been studied, and results indicated that food or its elements, like lactose, can enhance calcium absorption via a paracellular route in the intestine, [26][27][28] but what causes the different degrees of absorption between the calcium salts is a topic of discussion. Several studies have suggested that solubility plays a crucial role in intestinal absorption, [29][30][31] but others have suggested that solubility has little or no correlation with bioavailability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In pharmacokinetics, the kinetic processes of the drug in the body are simply divided into five steps referred to as ADME, that is, absorption (A), distribution (D), metabolism (M) and excretion (E), and assumed usually to be a linear first-order reaction. 22,23) The metabolic processes for a drug are defined using pharmacokinetic parameters including the area under the plasma concentration curve (AUC), bioavailability (F), distribution of volume, and clearance (CL), based on a compartmental or non-compartmental model. When dose D of a drug is given, the pharmacokinetic characterization of calcium absorption should help to understand its therapeutic effects and its use in treatment strategies because of the following relationship:…”
Calcium is an essential mineral, and its deficiency causes several diseases such as osteoporosis. The absolute bioavailability of calcium using modern pharmacokinetic methods has not been determined even though the relative bioavailability of calcium from various calcium salts has been examined using classic kinetics and pharmacokinetics. The serum calcium concentrations of three calcium salts, calcium chloride, calcium acetate and calcium ascorbate, were measured at various times after intravenous (i.v.) and oral administrations in mice, and the pharmacokinetic behaviors of the salts were investigated using a noncompartmental model. The degree of dissociation of the calcium salts was determined based on the extent of freezing-point depression. The pharmacokinetic parameters, MRT, Vdss, CLtot and AUC for i.v. administration of calcium at 15 and 30 mg/kg from three calcium salts indicated that all three may undergo similar mechanisms of calcium metabolism. The pharmacokinetic process was linear due to a first-order reaction. The pharmacokinetic parameters of calcium after oral administration at 150 mg/kg indicated that the calcium absorption was significantly different among the three calcium salts. The absolute calcium bioavailability of calcium ascorbate and calcium acetate was 2.6 and 1.5-fold, respectively, greater than that of calcium chloride. The mean residence time, MRTab, for absorption of calcium from calcium ascorbate was longer than those from calcium chloride and calcium acetate. Furthermore, it was estimated that calcium absorbed by passing through the intestinal membrane was the dissociated form because of higher degrees of apparent dissociation for the three salts. The calcium absorbability from calcium ascorbate via the intestinal track is significantly higher than those of calcium chloride and calcium acetate.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.