1995
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19950401)75:7<1718::aid-cncr2820750725>3.0.co;2-g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

History of maternal fetal loss and increased risk of childhood acute leukemia at an early age. A report from the childrens cancer group

Abstract: Background. Maternal reproductive history of fetal loss previously has been reported to be associated with an increased risk of leukemia in subsequent offspring. Data from a Childrens Cancer Group (CCG) case‐control study were analyzed to test the hypothesis that this association was dependent on the number of previous fetal losses age at leukemia diagnosis. Methods. A case‐control study using a large Childrens Cancer Group database examined maternal history of fetal loss as a risk factor for childhood leukemi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0
3

Year Published

1998
1998
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
28
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A history of fetal loss may reflect genetic predisposition, abnormal intrauterine environment, or the effect of a common environmental exposure (Ross et al, 1997). While some studies similar to this study did not show any significant associations (Kaye et al, 1991;OU et al, 2002) others suggest it as a possible risk factor (Yeazel et al, 1995;Podvin et al, 2006;Specter et al, 2007). These controversies may be explained as follows: First, the characteristics of leukemia cases in different studies varied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…A history of fetal loss may reflect genetic predisposition, abnormal intrauterine environment, or the effect of a common environmental exposure (Ross et al, 1997). While some studies similar to this study did not show any significant associations (Kaye et al, 1991;OU et al, 2002) others suggest it as a possible risk factor (Yeazel et al, 1995;Podvin et al, 2006;Specter et al, 2007). These controversies may be explained as follows: First, the characteristics of leukemia cases in different studies varied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…It has been reported in a few studies that prior fetal loss significantly increased the risk of acute leukemia, 12,25 whereas most others reported no difference in risk. [15][16][17][20][21][22][23][24] One study demonstrated an inverse association.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies in children without DS have indicated no or little elevation in risk for advanced maternal age, [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] prior fetal loss, 12,[14][15][16][17][20][21][22][23][24][25] prior contraceptive use, 15,[26][27][28] time between births, 16,22 and birth order. 12,[14][15][16]20,21,[29][30][31] However, those factors may have a greater impact on the development of leukemia in children with DS, because trisomy 21 may represent a first genetic ''hit,'' and stronger associations may be expected than those reported in studies of children without DS.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since insulin-like growth factor-1 is important in blood formation and regulation and has been shown to stimulate the growth of both myeloid and lymphoid cells in culture, it was postulated that high levels of insulin-like growth factor-1 might produce large babies and contribute to the development of leukemia (46). A maternal history of fetal loss has also been associated with a five-to 12-fold increased risk of developing ALL or AML (47). However, Ross et al (48) later showed that the relationships between birth weight, prior fetal loss, and risk of infant leukemia appear to be complex, and that only highbirth weight was in fact a significant risk factor of developing childhood leukemia.…”
Section: Emerenciano Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%