2016
DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

History of Gynecologic Pathology XXVIII

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From my 30 years of writing historical papers on pathology and laboratory medicine [14,2124] and from readings recently completed to finish an invited article on the politics of pathology and laboratory medicine in the 1920s [3], it is clear that Hillkowitz was the mouthpiece for the ASCP movement, that Burdick was its meticulous organizer, and that they worked together seamlessly through letter writing campaigns and numerous meetings with the ACS. Burdick's contributions to the field of clinical pathology were deemed so great by his contemporary professional colleagues that the ASCP named its first and still most prestigious award after him (Fig.…”
Section: Ward Thomas Burdickmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From my 30 years of writing historical papers on pathology and laboratory medicine [14,2124] and from readings recently completed to finish an invited article on the politics of pathology and laboratory medicine in the 1920s [3], it is clear that Hillkowitz was the mouthpiece for the ASCP movement, that Burdick was its meticulous organizer, and that they worked together seamlessly through letter writing campaigns and numerous meetings with the ACS. Burdick's contributions to the field of clinical pathology were deemed so great by his contemporary professional colleagues that the ASCP named its first and still most prestigious award after him (Fig.…”
Section: Ward Thomas Burdickmentioning
confidence: 99%