History of Coronary Angiography

Wake, Ryotaro; Yoshiyama, Minoru; Iida, Hidetaka; Takeshita, Hiroaki; Kusuyama, Takanori; Kanamitsu, Hitoshi; Mitsui, Hideya; Yamada, Yuma; Shimodozono, Shinichi; Haze, Kazuo

doi:10.5772/22578

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In 1960 F. Mason Sones performed the first selective Coronary Angiography (CAG), however, from that moment on the technique of coronary artery imaging has dynamically improved. Nowadays CAG is a gold standard tool for myocardial infarction assessment and for coronary artery diseases treatment [1]. Radial artery access is preferred rather than the transfemoral approach due to lower bleeding complications ratio and reduction in costs and hospitalization time [1].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Nowadays CAG is a gold standard tool for myocardial infarction assessment and for coronary artery diseases treatment [1]. Radial artery access is preferred rather than the transfemoral approach due to lower bleeding complications ratio and reduction in costs and hospitalization time [1]. In addition, there are no major nerves or vessels located close to the artery, which decreases the risk of complications.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Comparison of Safety and Efficiency between Tiger-2 Catheter with Right Radial Artery Access and Judkins Catheter with Left Radial Artery Access

Klimek

Świątek

Klocek

et al. 2021

JCM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We sought to compare the safety and efficiency of Tiger-2 in the right radial and Judkins catheter in the left radial access. We retrospectively collected data of 487 patients, involving 172 patients after coronary angiography with Judkins on the left radial artery and 315 patients with Tiger-2 on the right radial artery access. There were no differences in baseline characteristics, except for hypertension ratio and mean age. There was a difference in pulse absence on the radial artery. The volume of contrast used was higher in the Judkins group. Both groups differed in the amount of drugs administered (NTG and heparin). Fluorescence times were comparable between groups. Radiation dosage and AK was significantly greater in the Tiger-2 group. The Tiger-2 catheters were significantly more often changed to another type of catheter (100 changes) than the Judkins (12 changes). However, there was no statistical difference in access site change. Judkins with left radial access seems to be a safer option because of the lower radiation exposure and less incidence of complications than Tiger-2 with right radial access, however, it requires a higher volume of contrast.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%