2002
DOI: 10.15572/enco2002.03
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

History, memory and learning to teach

Abstract: How do individual and social memories get reworked in the crucible of a teacher education program, as student-teachers prepare to teach history to the next generation in a democratic, multicultural, and multinational state? is study posits four key competencies that studentteachers need in order to transcend history as the simple transmission of social memory. It takes the form of intertwined autobiographical narratives of the three authors: two were studentteachers and the third, their instructor. It recount… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Research on teacher education suggests the need for teacher candidates to develop skills with instructional practices related to inquiry such as writing and historical interpretation, distinguishing between different historical arguments, recognizing that historical interpretations can change and evolve over time, and understanding history as a cognitively sophisticated discipline in which conclusions are provisional and subject to reinterpretation (Bain & Mirel, 2006;Bohan & Davis, 1998;Fallace, 2007;Fallace & Neem, 2005;Seixas, Fromowitz, & Hill, 2002). Although the benefits of inquiry-oriented approaches may seem well-established in light of scholarly research, empirical investigations into teacher education programs demonstrate the uneven ways in which such practices get taken up by pre-service and in-service teachers.…”
Section: Theoretical Background/conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on teacher education suggests the need for teacher candidates to develop skills with instructional practices related to inquiry such as writing and historical interpretation, distinguishing between different historical arguments, recognizing that historical interpretations can change and evolve over time, and understanding history as a cognitively sophisticated discipline in which conclusions are provisional and subject to reinterpretation (Bain & Mirel, 2006;Bohan & Davis, 1998;Fallace, 2007;Fallace & Neem, 2005;Seixas, Fromowitz, & Hill, 2002). Although the benefits of inquiry-oriented approaches may seem well-established in light of scholarly research, empirical investigations into teacher education programs demonstrate the uneven ways in which such practices get taken up by pre-service and in-service teachers.…”
Section: Theoretical Background/conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Seixas, Fromowitz, and Hill (2002) note about teacher education in history, it is “crucial that they [pre-service teachers] develop knowledge, approaches, and dispositions that transcend the simple evocation of knowledge” (p. 44). Yet, investigations into inquiry in secondary science classrooms (Kuhn et al, 2000) provide sobering evidence of just how difficult it is for young adolescents to develop the cognitive skills necessary for doing inquiry-oriented learning.…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Memory is the product of direct experience; history is the product of [a disciplined] questioning, inquiry and critique. (2005, p. 116) However, Seixas, Fomowitz and Hill (2005) go on to argue that 'this simple bifurcation fails on many counts' (p. 116). It does not take into account the fiercely held ramifications of 'the structures of social memory, as well as the deeply felt passions that stir people to engage in history ' (p. 116).…”
Section: The Historical Novel and Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%