“…The situation recalls Eric Slauter's 2008 essay on the ''disciplinary trade gap'' between history and literature in the study of early America. 2 Slauter explains that whereas twenty or thirty years ago, non-literary fields, above all history, looked to literary studies as a ''major exporter of ideas and methods,'' literary scholars now import more scholarship from history than they export, resulting in a significant citational imbalance and the persistent sense that one discipline is talking and another is listening. 3 The discrepancy, he notes, gives rise to the chronic resentment of something like an unrequited admiration.…”