1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(99)90246-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

History, implementation, and current status of the national spinal cord injury database

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
0
4

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
57
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The inclusion and exclusion criteria, data collection process, quality control, and collaborating centers of the database have been previously described in detail. 11 For the present study, we limited the analyses to participants enrolled in the database between 1986 and 1995, aged 15 to 80 years at injury, and discharged alive from initial hospital care. A total of 5711 SCI patients were eligible for the present study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inclusion and exclusion criteria, data collection process, quality control, and collaborating centers of the database have been previously described in detail. 11 For the present study, we limited the analyses to participants enrolled in the database between 1986 and 1995, aged 15 to 80 years at injury, and discharged alive from initial hospital care. A total of 5711 SCI patients were eligible for the present study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional eligibility criteria and their changes over time have been documented previously. 11,12 Evaluations were conducted 5 years post-injury on 9225 of these persons. Reasons for not conducting a fifth annual evaluation include death or complete recovery during the first 5 years, injuries during 2001-2006 that are not yet 5 years old, injuries during the last 5 years of funding of several model systems that dropped out of the program at various times during the past 3 decades, and losses to follow-up because of inability to locate or refusal to participate.…”
Section: Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional details of the data collection and quality control procedures have been reported previously. 11,12 Measures Demographic information contained in the NSCISC database and used in this study includes age, gender, race/ethnicity, educational level, and employment status at time of injury and annual evaluation. Injury severity is assessed by using the most current version of the International Standards for Neurological Classification at model system admission, discharge, and annual evaluation (if the annual evaluation was performed in person).…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…spinalcord.uab.edu/show.asp?durki ¼ 24480&site ¼ 1287 &return ¼ 19775. [6][7] Review and revision of the draft core data set syllabus was accomplished through an iterative e-mail process and a series of executive committee telephone conference calls and open meetings.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%