2017
DOI: 10.3390/rel8020022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

History, Hysteria, and Hype: Government Contracting with Faith-Based Social Service Agencies

Abstract: Abstract:In light of the adoption of the Charitable Choice Provision of the Welfare Reform Bill and the creation of White House Offices on faith based initiatives this article examines the history of government contracting with faith-based organizations to deliver human and social services with a particular focus on how the U. S. Supreme Court has viewed the legal status of such contracts.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this, he referenced racist stereotypes of Black people as lazy and irresponsible (Seccombe 1999). The welfare reform law of 1996 included a turn toward for community-oriented, faith-based initiatives, which resulted in increased involvement of religious social service agencies for anti-poverty 2 of 19 services, increasing the social safety net system's fragmentation (Gilman 2006;Queen 2017). Welfare reform also dismantled the need-based system in favor of a "work-based" system in which work has become a condition for public cash benefits for working-aged adults (Danziger et al 2016;Hardy et al 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this, he referenced racist stereotypes of Black people as lazy and irresponsible (Seccombe 1999). The welfare reform law of 1996 included a turn toward for community-oriented, faith-based initiatives, which resulted in increased involvement of religious social service agencies for anti-poverty 2 of 19 services, increasing the social safety net system's fragmentation (Gilman 2006;Queen 2017). Welfare reform also dismantled the need-based system in favor of a "work-based" system in which work has become a condition for public cash benefits for working-aged adults (Danziger et al 2016;Hardy et al 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%