2009
DOI: 10.1080/01596300902809294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

History and the making of young people and the late modern youth researcher: time, narrative, and change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In brief, it is my hope that this interdisciplinary methodology may provide the foundation for examining the complex dynamics and variegated effects of school choice on young people's interpretations and imaginations of choice based on their lived experiences of the current urban school system. In this respect, I do not see the critical, interpretivist, and anthropological traditions as incommensurable; rather, I agree with the community of scholars who find that bridging dimensions of related paradigms can provide more nuanced and refined qualitative research when these paradigms are cautiously interwoven into the analysis (Dillabough, 2009;Lather, 1991Lather, , 2006Lincoln & Guba, 2003;Lincoln et al, 2011). This cross-paradigmatic and interdisciplinary approach is a viable one for understanding the effects of policy as a complex social and cultural phenomenon.…”
Section: What Is a Critical Socio-phenomenological Policy Analysis?mentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In brief, it is my hope that this interdisciplinary methodology may provide the foundation for examining the complex dynamics and variegated effects of school choice on young people's interpretations and imaginations of choice based on their lived experiences of the current urban school system. In this respect, I do not see the critical, interpretivist, and anthropological traditions as incommensurable; rather, I agree with the community of scholars who find that bridging dimensions of related paradigms can provide more nuanced and refined qualitative research when these paradigms are cautiously interwoven into the analysis (Dillabough, 2009;Lather, 1991Lather, , 2006Lincoln & Guba, 2003;Lincoln et al, 2011). This cross-paradigmatic and interdisciplinary approach is a viable one for understanding the effects of policy as a complex social and cultural phenomenon.…”
Section: What Is a Critical Socio-phenomenological Policy Analysis?mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Young people are not necessarily singular authors who can make singular claims of their own, since notions of selfhood and memory are already situated in social and historical modes of identification (Bourdieu, 1984(Bourdieu, , 2000Bourdieu & Wacquant, 1992;Skeggs, 1997). In exploring the historical dimension of young people's meaning-making, I thus further follow Bourdieu (2000), Baert (1998), and Dillabough's (2009) leads in theorizing social space as historical. In other words, I explore young people's interpretations and imaginations in relation to historically specific configurations of classed and racialized urban spaces.…”
Section: What Is a Critical Socio-phenomenological Policy Analysis?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drawing from Dillabough's (2009) theory of the temporality of young people's narratives, I draw upon youth accounts, experiences and imaginaries to showcase how the social world is changing yet enduring, especially in the de-coupling of schoolÁneighbourhood communities. I chose an ethnography with an interdisciplinary methodological framework, using Foucaultian studies, British cultural studies and spatial theories (Dillabough, 2009;Dillabough, Kennelly, & Wang, 2007, 2008Gulson, 2006, Gulson, 2011Nayak, 2003;Rose, 1996Rose, , 1999Shore & Wright, 1997;Willis, 1981). This umbrella framework uses Foucaultian anthropology of policy to illuminate the relationship between changing systems and technologies of governance.…”
Section: Interdisciplinary Methodology and Multi-sited Ethnographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Dillabough (2009) says, there is a 'pressing need for a reflexive awareness of the extent and complexity of the challenges of the field' (p. 213). Point-in-time snapshots of youthful lives may be misleading unless contextualized within historical and sociological narratives that incorporate temporal perspectives (McLeod & Yates, 2006), as well as the perspectives of young people themselves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In the growing field of youth studies, it is sometimes the case that theoretical frameworks may pre-empt readings of data before empirical work has been undertaken. According to Dillabough (2009): Theory is often identified or conflated with the data themselves. In other words, theory emerges as the dominating source of information .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%