2004
DOI: 10.1191/0309132504ph483pr
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

History and philosophy of geography: discipline and discourse, 2001 2002

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Heffernan, 2003; Livingstone, 2003; Withers, 2006). ‘Just how far back should the history of geography go?’ is a question Ryan (2004: 235) poses in his review of geography’s history. The answer, of course, depends on how such histories of geography are written, and on those who do the writing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heffernan, 2003; Livingstone, 2003; Withers, 2006). ‘Just how far back should the history of geography go?’ is a question Ryan (2004: 235) poses in his review of geography’s history. The answer, of course, depends on how such histories of geography are written, and on those who do the writing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As with any disciplinary history, it also reflects the 'preoccupations' of academic (imagined) communities or, as Robert Mayhew nicely put it, 'republics of letters ' (2010: 250). Both the temporal foreshortening of historiographies of geography and the dramatic narrowing of the temporal spectrum in human geographers' work highlighted by Keith Lilley and others before him (Jones, 2004;Ryan, 2004) are reflexive of such preoccupations. As Jones (2004) observes, predominant focus on Enlightenment geographies in the 1990s, for example, can be read as part of a broader interest in Empire underpinned by a political (postcolonial) agenda.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%