1998
DOI: 10.1300/j075v18n02_02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

History and Contribution of Organizational Behavior Management to Services for Persons with Developmental Disabilities

Abstract: This article traces the development of the field oforganizational behavior managcment (OBM) from its origins in early behavior modification studies, the development of a technology for modifying statf bchavior, to recent developments in the evolution of cultures. An ecological model of staff behavior is outlined using Bronfenbrenner's (1979) ecological model of human development. The technology used to modify staff behavior is briefly reviewed. In Peter Sturmey, PhD, is affiliated with the San Antonio State Sc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These training programs have been criticized due to demonstrated ineffectiveness for establishing the targeted performance skills (Casey & McWilliam, 2011;Clark et al, 2004;Sturmey, 1998). The evidence-based protocol described here represents an alternative approach that applies the critical components of BST (i.e., instructions, modeling, rehearsal, feedback) to staff training with demonstrated effectiveness.…”
Section: Ensuring Effectiveness Of Staff Training Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These training programs have been criticized due to demonstrated ineffectiveness for establishing the targeted performance skills (Casey & McWilliam, 2011;Clark et al, 2004;Sturmey, 1998). The evidence-based protocol described here represents an alternative approach that applies the critical components of BST (i.e., instructions, modeling, rehearsal, feedback) to staff training with demonstrated effectiveness.…”
Section: Ensuring Effectiveness Of Staff Training Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have continued to examine the effects of staff training strategies to allow for more effective and efficient use of behavioral procedures with individuals with disabilities. Despite this existing research, many staff in human service agencies often do not acquire the skills that the procedures are intended to train (Casey & McWilliam, 2011;Clark, Cushing, & Kennedy, 2004;Sturmey, 1998). Hence, if behavior analysts are to successfully fulfill their staff-training responsibilities, additional guidance on best-practice implementation of staff training strategies is warranted.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather, we suggest that it presents at least a case for relationship building. Nonetheless, we and many others (e.g., Baumeister & Zaharia, 1987;Larson, Hewitt, & Lakin, 2004;Sturmey, 1998;Test, Flowers, Hewitt, & Sollow, 2003) have observed a number of problematic issues when new or otherwise unfamiliar staff begin working with consumers in adult service agencies and hope that the results here and corresponding implications will be of benefit for other behavior analysts who encounter problems in this respect.…”
Section: General Discussion and Recommendations For Practitionersmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Esta situación se relaciona al concepto de Sturmey (1998) de interacciones por acomodación (combinación y fusión) en la que la dinámica organizacional puede verse influida por la dinámica grupal. La interacción se produce cuando una unidad de acción producida por A actúa como estímulo para una unidad de respuesta en el sujeto B y viceversa, constituyendo un proceso circular.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Resulta importante que se haya señalado la falta de control en cuanto al desempeño real de cada colaborador, lo que puede originar situaciones conflictivas que inciden en las mediciones de cargas de trabajo. Este contexto se relaciona con el concepto de las interacciones por oposición de Sturmey (1998), en las que el conflicto y competición inciden en los niveles de productividad, precisamente porque la interacción es entendida como la fuerza interna de la acción colectiva vista desde la perspectiva de los que participan, y esta puede generar resultados negativos si no hay una percepción generalizada de que el trabajo se distribuye de manera equitativa.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified