2005
DOI: 10.1080/00933104.2005.10473285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Historiographical Thinking: Towards a New Approach to Preparing History Teachers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While historians have this ability, his study demonstrated that successful high school students of history may not. Fallace and Neem (2005) suggest that when historians read a text they go beyond reading just for subtext. In Wineburg's study, the one historian he interviewed who was in his area of expertise (Early America) when reading the presented document, remarked, "What I think of is a book I read by Jack Rakove talking about how one of the problems at the time was getting the colonies to hang together" (p. 498).…”
Section: Modes Of Disciplinary Thinkingmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While historians have this ability, his study demonstrated that successful high school students of history may not. Fallace and Neem (2005) suggest that when historians read a text they go beyond reading just for subtext. In Wineburg's study, the one historian he interviewed who was in his area of expertise (Early America) when reading the presented document, remarked, "What I think of is a book I read by Jack Rakove talking about how one of the problems at the time was getting the colonies to hang together" (p. 498).…”
Section: Modes Of Disciplinary Thinkingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Underlying the course was a distinction between different types of disciplinary thinking in history (see Fallace and Neem, 2005). Historiology is the study of the epistemological and ontological value of the past and its relationship to the historian's craft (the process of writing Downloaded by [University of Stellenbosch] at 18:02 04 October 2014 history).…”
Section: Modes Of Disciplinary Thinkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, epistemological beliefs refer to conceptions of the nature of knowledge and knowing (Pintrich, 2002). Building upon the ideas of Perry (1970), many scholars in the domain of history education distinguish between less and more sophisticated beliefs (Fallace & Neem, 2005 Van Sledright & reddy, 2014). Well-known is the study of maggioni et al (2009), describing a three-stance model in which pupils can develop from a copier stance (historical knowledge is a 'copy' of the past) to a relativist stance (historical knowledge is merely a matter of opinion), and from a relativist to a criterialist stance (historical knowledge is interpretative, but also restrained by disciplinary criteria).…”
Section: Historical Thinking and Epistemologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we may read about particular actionresearch or classroom projects in various Canadian settings (Cardin, Éthier, & Meunier, 2010;Lévesque, 2003Lévesque, , 2009Peck & Seixas 2008;Seixas, 1993a), we lack a more global perspective on teachers' historical consciousness as evidenced by their background knowledge, their perceptions of the trustworthiness of sources, their experiences in the history classroom, and their vision of school history. 1 Indeed, growing research has suggested that knowing history is more complex than mastering vast historical facts, as is bridging the gap between novice and expert harder than overcoming the disparity between disciplinary knowledge and pedagogy among future teachers (Fallace 2007(Fallace , 2009Fallace & Neem, 2005). As Barton and Levstik (2003) suggested, exemplary history teachers possess and deploy strategic forms of knowledge, which implies "doing history"; engaging learners in historical activities and inquiries, sourcing historical information, assessing the value of sources, and considering various perspectives.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%