1990
DOI: 10.1007/bf02723911
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Historical research in marketing: Retrospect and prospect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Periodization as a methodology is not without its limitations which must be acknowledged. As depicted by other scholars, due to the nature of the data sources available for this analysis it can be difficult to assess the extent to which the publication dealt with or explained change through time as the majority of texts included described what was happening within the social marketing discipline at one point in time and did not compare state of play (particularly in the early eras) with other points in time (Jones and Monieson, 1990).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Periodization as a methodology is not without its limitations which must be acknowledged. As depicted by other scholars, due to the nature of the data sources available for this analysis it can be difficult to assess the extent to which the publication dealt with or explained change through time as the majority of texts included described what was happening within the social marketing discipline at one point in time and did not compare state of play (particularly in the early eras) with other points in time (Jones and Monieson, 1990).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent privileging of historical matters in marketing scholarship also underlines just how much history has to teach us. Already we have nascent literatures on marketing history (Bartels, 1976;Nevett and Fullerton, 1988;Jones and Monieson, 1990), nostalgia (Holbrook, 1993;Goulding 1999), retro-marketing (Brown, 2001), advertising recall (Burke and Srull, 1988), not to mention tomes that celebrate the Golden Age of Advertising (Bregman, 2002;Heimann, 2005), periodic paeans to making use of the past as a guide to the future (Savitt, 1989;Brown and Maclaran, 1996;Day, 1996), a biennial Conference on Historical Analysis and Research in Marketing (CHARM) which celebrates its 25th anniversary in 2008, and how could we forget the newly launched Journal of Historical Research in Marketing? This paper doesn't seek to subvert such obvious reality.…”
Section: Rememberingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To fully appreciate the development of the discipline requires a historical perspective. This presents some difficulties for marketing academics since marketing history is one of the least developed specialisms and competing views of its development are limited (Holden and Holden, 1998;Jones and Monieson, 1990). The most authoritative account is provided by Bartels (1983), who argues that the lack of theorists in marketing can be traced back to the 1960s and is the outcome the relative influence of organized groups of US practitioners and academics that today comprise the American Marketing Association.…”
Section: Lack Of Theoristsmentioning
confidence: 99%