Historical Observations on European Archaeology

Milišauskas, Šarūnas

doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-6633-9_2

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…bArreto, 1999(p.ex. bArreto, /2000dAniel, 1975;delAge, 2017;funAri, 2008;grAves et al, 2016;milisAukAs, 2011;moshenskA, 2017;murrAy, 2017;WAtson, 2009;Willey;.…”

Section: Meliammentioning

confidence: 99%

Etnografando a arqueologia: dado etnográfico, prática etnográfica e conhecimento arqueológico

Silva

2024

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Este livro visa demonstrar a importância do dado etnográfico e da prática etnográfica na construção do conhecimento arqueológico, do século XIX até a atualidade. Trata-se de uma revisão bibliográfica sobre este tema, contemplando majoritariamente, a produção científica das arqueologias anglo-americana e brasileira sobre analogia etnográfica, etnoarqueologia, etnografia arqueológica, arqueologia do/no presente, etnografia da arqueologia, arqueologia etnográfica. O trabalho também busca mostrar algumas características e tendências da disciplina arqueológica, ao longo do tempo.

show abstract

“…bArreto, 1999(p.ex. bArreto, /2000dAniel, 1975;delAge, 2017;funAri, 2008;grAves et al, 2016;milisAukAs, 2011;moshenskA, 2017;murrAy, 2017;WAtson, 2009;Willey;.…”

Section: Meliammentioning

confidence: 99%

Etnografando a arqueologia: dado etnográfico, prática etnográfica e conhecimento arqueológico

Silva

2024

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…On the one hand, this means unequal opportunities for reading, and especially for writing, in Englishspeaking and other countries. On the other hand, thousands of archaeologists from all over the world have to communicate with each other in one or two languages (Harding 2007;Milisauskas 2011;Neustupný 1997-98). Since English is learned as the foreign language of first choice in the majority of European countries, this issue is less important to younger archaeologists, while numerous scholars of the older generation studied French, German, Spanish or Russian.…”

Section: Shades Of Brown: the Invisible Hand Of The Nation State Or Tmentioning

confidence: 99%

Is archaeology still the project of nation states? An editorial comment

Brück¹,

Stutz²

2016

Arch. Dial.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The European Association of Archaeologists has long fostered critical analysis of the relationship between archaeology and politics, particularly the politics of national, regional and supra-regional identities. Although the role of nationalism in the birth of archaeology as a discipline is well recognized, the events of the past few years – from the referendum on Scottish independence in 2014, to the movement for secession in eastern Ukraine, and the rise of explicitly nationalist political movements across the continent – suggest that the (re)formulation of national identities is likely to continue to have major implications both for our interpretation of the past and for the practice of archaeology in the present. In light of this, the Archaeological dialogues editorial board organized a round table at the EAA meeting in Glasgow in September 2015 to explore the extent to which institutional, legislative and funding structures as well as political and cultural imperatives continue to bind our discipline into the construction of nationalist narratives, and this more or less in spite of long-standing critical debates within the discipline itself that for decades have problematized the relationship. Are we caught in a ‘can't-live-with-and-can't-live-without’ situation? While explicitly nationalist archaeologies have become almost obsolete in the European academies, we rarely contemplate the impact of nationalism on funding or the definition and protection of cultural heritage, for example. Several of the following papers suggest that without the nation state's involvement, the vicissitudes of global capitalism would result in a situation where it would be extremely difficult to adequately protect our ‘heritage’, however that is defined.

show abstract

Digitising and Re-examining Vere Gordon Childe’s ‘Dawn of European Civilization’: a celebration of the UCL Institute of Archaeology’s 80th Anniversary

Meheux¹

2017

Archaeology International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article presents a detailed examination of Gordon Childe's The Dawn of European Civilization, one of the best known books in European Archaeology. An overview of the book, its scope and influence is provided, as well as an analysis of its complex theoretical structures and philosophical context. Detailed sequential analysis of all six editions reveals how the original was repeatedly reinvented by Childe over a thirty year period in response to advances in European archaeology, his own theoretical interests and external political factors. The importance of the book for the history of 20 th century archaeology and its role as an 'ancestral text' are assessed.

show abstract

Historical Observations on European Archaeology

Cited by 3 publications

References 26 publications

Etnografando a arqueologia: dado etnográfico, prática etnográfica e conhecimento arqueológico

Etnografando a arqueologia: dado etnográfico, prática etnográfica e conhecimento arqueológico

Is archaeology still the project of nation states? An editorial comment

Digitising and Re-examining Vere Gordon Childe’s ‘Dawn of European Civilization’: a celebration of the UCL Institute of Archaeology’s 80th Anniversary

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About