2020
DOI: 10.1108/ijssp-03-2020-0072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Historical memory in the management of cultural security system of Russian society

Abstract: PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to develop a model of management of cultural security of Russian society.Design/methodology/approachThe methodological foundation of this research consists in comprehensive approach and activity approach, which make it possible to comprehend specific aspects of cultural security management as an element of the national security system. The research uses a riskologic approach, which reveals the nature of modern risks and threats to cultural security in the information society… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, Fuchs et al (2021) for Germany highlighted the cooperation between universities of applied sciences and foreign subsidiaries in providing industry-specific skills. The availability of appropriate trainers, the readiness and capacity of academia to offer high-quality education and training, and the state of university-industry are (positive) predictors of training activity (see Aslam et al, 2022;Davis & Amirbekova, 2019;Esteban-Lloret et al, 2018;Jackson et al, 2022;Oseghale et al, 2018;Rowe, 2019;Vodenko et al, 2017).…”
Section: Macro-level Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, Fuchs et al (2021) for Germany highlighted the cooperation between universities of applied sciences and foreign subsidiaries in providing industry-specific skills. The availability of appropriate trainers, the readiness and capacity of academia to offer high-quality education and training, and the state of university-industry are (positive) predictors of training activity (see Aslam et al, 2022;Davis & Amirbekova, 2019;Esteban-Lloret et al, 2018;Jackson et al, 2022;Oseghale et al, 2018;Rowe, 2019;Vodenko et al, 2017).…”
Section: Macro-level Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%