2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.pepi.2004.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Historical measurements of the Earth's magnetic field compared with remanence directions from lava flows in Italy over the last four centuries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
37
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
37
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that in Kircher (1641), the inclination value is 65°50′ on page 401, but 65°40′ on page 410. Nevertheless, regarding the distribution of the data, we do not see any reason to reject this particular datum, in contrast with doubt raised by Lanza et al (2005) and D ' Ajello Caracciolo et al (2011). The Italian dataset does not contain any other inclination value until the measurements made by Alexander von Humboldt in 1805-1806(e.g., Cafarella et al 1992.…”
Section: Examination Of the Available Recordscontrasting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We note that in Kircher (1641), the inclination value is 65°50′ on page 401, but 65°40′ on page 410. Nevertheless, regarding the distribution of the data, we do not see any reason to reject this particular datum, in contrast with doubt raised by Lanza et al (2005) and D ' Ajello Caracciolo et al (2011). The Italian dataset does not contain any other inclination value until the measurements made by Alexander von Humboldt in 1805-1806(e.g., Cafarella et al 1992.…”
Section: Examination Of the Available Recordscontrasting
confidence: 92%
“…3 but with no reference), which actually corresponds to the values expected at this location from the gufm1 model. It was calculated by Lanza et al (2005) to compensate for the very small number of Italian historical data between AD 1600 and 1805. This mistake therefore introduces a harmful interference from gufm1 into the SCHA model for the Italian region.…”
Section: Examination Of the Available Recordsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of historical lava-flow units has revealed many cases where the ChRM direction deviated from the Earth's field. In the case of Italian volcanoes, a disagreement of a few degrees between the secular variation (SV) curve derived from historical direct measurements of the Earth's field and the lava-flow unit's remanence directions has long been pointed out in the literature (Rolph et al 1987;Incoronato et al 2002;Tanguy et al 2003) and has been shown to occur for practically all the post-1631 lavas; the ChRM direction of which can be checked against historical direct measurements (Lanza et al 2005).…”
Section: Archaeomagnetic Direction: Error and Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, there is no reason why rel should be constant in time over large distances. Analysis of historical data suggests that rel between Rome and Paris varied in the range of 1 • -3 • during the last centuries (Lanza et al 2005). The actual reference curve used for dating is not clearly indicated in Principe et al (2004), where they first refer to the Tanguy et al (1999) Mount Etna and the French (Bucur 1994) SV curves, before writing ".…”
Section: Archaeomagnetic Dating: Model and Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Italy studies measuring the Earth's magnetic field have a long history (Lanza et al, 2005;Meloni et al, 2007). The earliest documented measurements can be found from the mid-16th century on (Cafarella et al, 1992a;Cafarella et al, 1992b), while the first systematic observations of the magnetic vector began as progress was being made in geomagnetism in the 19th century.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%