2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00382-017-3834-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Historical forcings as main drivers of the Atlantic multidecadal variability in the CESM large ensemble

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

12
126
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
12
126
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The external forcing of the model's AMV and the lead‐lag relationships between its AMV and AMOC shows that earlier findings (Bellomo et al, ; Murphy et al, ; Tandon & Kushner, ) hold also for simulations initialized from different ocean states. The consequential small role allowed for internal ocean variability in explaining AMOC variations given external forcings ‐historical and prospective‐ has received little attention in the literature so far.…”
Section: Summary Discussion and Conclusionsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The external forcing of the model's AMV and the lead‐lag relationships between its AMV and AMOC shows that earlier findings (Bellomo et al, ; Murphy et al, ; Tandon & Kushner, ) hold also for simulations initialized from different ocean states. The consequential small role allowed for internal ocean variability in explaining AMOC variations given external forcings ‐historical and prospective‐ has received little attention in the literature so far.…”
Section: Summary Discussion and Conclusionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…A key issue are the roles of internal variability versus external forcing during the historical period (Knight, ; Ting et al, , ), and the extent of their interaction (Tandon & Kushner, ). A dominant role for external forcing, especially from volcanic eruptions, has for instance been concluded from models, observations, and last‐millennium proxies (e.g., Bellomo et al, , Knudsen et al, , Otterå et al, , Wang et al, ), but the assessment is complicated by the short observational record and the complex spatiotemporal nature of North Atlantic SST variability, making findings controversial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High correlations between the observed and simulated NASST have been put forward as the key evidence supporting externally forced AMV (Bellomo et al, ; Booth et al, ; Murphy et al, ). Figure a shows the 20‐year low‐pass‐filtered NASST anomalies from HadISST and the LENS ensemble mean.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many previous studies have consistently attributed observed AMV primarily to internal variability associated with the AMOC (e.g., DelSole et al, ; Knight, ; Ting et al, ; Trenberth & Shea, ; Z. Wu, Huang, et al, ; Zanchettin et al, ). On the other hand, some recent studies have proposed the hypotheses that AMV is primarily a direct response of the North Atlantic SST to either changes in external radiative forcing (e.g., Bellomo et al, ; Bellucci et al, ; Booth et al, ; Murphy et al, ) or stochastic atmospheric forcing (e.g., Cane et al, ; Clement et al, , ), although these views have been questioned (e.g., Drews & Greatbatch, , ; Kim, Yeager, & Danabasoglu, ; O'Reilly et al, ; Sun et al, ; Yan et al, , , ; Zhang, ; Zhang et al, , ). The traditional AMV index, which is based on the North Atlantic SST anomalies as first proposed by Enfield et al (), is convenient to use due to the availability of SST records over the instrumental period and the close linkage of SST with climate impacts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%