2015
DOI: 10.17581/bp.2015.04219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Historical Distribution of Metasequoia Referenced to Paleoclimate Factors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The phylogenetic tree showed two clades in M. glyptostroboides , but the haplotypes mixed in space, supporting the presence of only one ESU. M. glyptostroboides was widely distributed across the northern hemisphere in the Paleocene (Lepage et al, 2005 ), and began to contract in the late Miocene and Pliocene probably due to the cool temperate and arid climate developed (Lepage et al, 2005 ; Zhang & Wang, 2015 ). Fossil records indicate that Metasequoia distribution continued to contract, and the remnant populations in China and Japan were under the control of warm temperate and moisture climate, until disappeared from Japan and other locations in China except the TGMR during the early Pleistocene (Liu et al, 2007 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phylogenetic tree showed two clades in M. glyptostroboides , but the haplotypes mixed in space, supporting the presence of only one ESU. M. glyptostroboides was widely distributed across the northern hemisphere in the Paleocene (Lepage et al, 2005 ), and began to contract in the late Miocene and Pliocene probably due to the cool temperate and arid climate developed (Lepage et al, 2005 ; Zhang & Wang, 2015 ). Fossil records indicate that Metasequoia distribution continued to contract, and the remnant populations in China and Japan were under the control of warm temperate and moisture climate, until disappeared from Japan and other locations in China except the TGMR during the early Pleistocene (Liu et al, 2007 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%