Abstract:Agricultural intensification is a key suspect among putative drivers of recent insect declines, but an explicit link between historical change in agricultural land cover and insect occurrence is lacking. Determining whether agriculture impacts beneficial insects (e.g. pollinators), is crucial to enhancing agricultural sustainability. Here, we combine large spatiotemporal sets of historical bumble bee and agricultural records to show that increasing cropland extent and decreasing crop richness were associated w… Show more
“…By contrast, work done in North America and Europe showed that species are failing to track warming at northern range limits and experiencing range losses at southern range limits [16]. Studies looking at North American bumblebee relative abundances have largely found declines, and are generally consistent with our estimates of declines [7,8,11,13].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Effects of land use on bumblebee occurrence have been difficult to quantify, particularly at this large scale, and here we show that floral resources might not be the ideal metric. For example, Hemberger et al [11] found that crop diversity, rather than crop extent, was a better predictor of changes in bumblebee occurrence and McArt et al [46] found that fungicide usage was a better predictor of bumblebee decline than land use. Lastly, our floral abundance metric was developed with all bee guilds in mind [35] and, thus, may not be appropriate for bumblebees.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several recent studies have made such progress for bumblebees. Hemberger et al [11] found that increasing cropland extent and decreasing crop richness were associated with bumblebee species’ declines in the Midwest, USA, but trends varied among species. Specifically, occurrences of B. terricola , B. fervidus and B. borealis declined with cropland extent, while occurrences of B. affinis , B. bimaculatus and B. impatiens increased.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether insect populations are experiencing global declines is a topic of current debate [1][2][3]. bumblebees are widespread, charismatic and provide critical pollination services to many different flowering plants [4][5][6], and thus their population trajectories are among the most well studied of wild insects [7][8][9][10][11]. Species' trends differ [10], with some in serious decline (e.g.…”
Mounting evidence suggests that climate change, agricultural intensification and disease are impacting bumblebee health and contributing to species’ declines. Identifying how these factors impact insect communities at large spatial and temporal scales is difficult, partly because species may respond in different ways. Further, the necessary data must span large spatial and temporal scales, which usually means they comprise aggregated, presence-only records collected using numerous methods (e.g. diversity surveys, educational collections, citizen-science projects, standardized ecological surveys). Here, we use occupancy models, which explicitly correct for biases in the species observation process, to quantify the effect of changes in temperature, precipitation and floral resources on bumblebee site occupancy over the past 12 decades in North America. We find no evidence of genus-wide declines in site occupancy, but do find that occupancy is strongly related to temperature, and is only weakly related to precipitation or floral resources. We also find that more species are likely to be climate change ‘losers’ than ‘winners’ and that this effect is primarily associated with changing temperature. Importantly, all trends were highly species-specific, highlighting that genus or community-wide measures may not reflect diverse species-specific patterns that are critical in guiding allocation of conservation resources.
“…By contrast, work done in North America and Europe showed that species are failing to track warming at northern range limits and experiencing range losses at southern range limits [16]. Studies looking at North American bumblebee relative abundances have largely found declines, and are generally consistent with our estimates of declines [7,8,11,13].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Effects of land use on bumblebee occurrence have been difficult to quantify, particularly at this large scale, and here we show that floral resources might not be the ideal metric. For example, Hemberger et al [11] found that crop diversity, rather than crop extent, was a better predictor of changes in bumblebee occurrence and McArt et al [46] found that fungicide usage was a better predictor of bumblebee decline than land use. Lastly, our floral abundance metric was developed with all bee guilds in mind [35] and, thus, may not be appropriate for bumblebees.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several recent studies have made such progress for bumblebees. Hemberger et al [11] found that increasing cropland extent and decreasing crop richness were associated with bumblebee species’ declines in the Midwest, USA, but trends varied among species. Specifically, occurrences of B. terricola , B. fervidus and B. borealis declined with cropland extent, while occurrences of B. affinis , B. bimaculatus and B. impatiens increased.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether insect populations are experiencing global declines is a topic of current debate [1][2][3]. bumblebees are widespread, charismatic and provide critical pollination services to many different flowering plants [4][5][6], and thus their population trajectories are among the most well studied of wild insects [7][8][9][10][11]. Species' trends differ [10], with some in serious decline (e.g.…”
Mounting evidence suggests that climate change, agricultural intensification and disease are impacting bumblebee health and contributing to species’ declines. Identifying how these factors impact insect communities at large spatial and temporal scales is difficult, partly because species may respond in different ways. Further, the necessary data must span large spatial and temporal scales, which usually means they comprise aggregated, presence-only records collected using numerous methods (e.g. diversity surveys, educational collections, citizen-science projects, standardized ecological surveys). Here, we use occupancy models, which explicitly correct for biases in the species observation process, to quantify the effect of changes in temperature, precipitation and floral resources on bumblebee site occupancy over the past 12 decades in North America. We find no evidence of genus-wide declines in site occupancy, but do find that occupancy is strongly related to temperature, and is only weakly related to precipitation or floral resources. We also find that more species are likely to be climate change ‘losers’ than ‘winners’ and that this effect is primarily associated with changing temperature. Importantly, all trends were highly species-specific, highlighting that genus or community-wide measures may not reflect diverse species-specific patterns that are critical in guiding allocation of conservation resources.
“…However, a mixed diet of complementary foods has been shown to be beneficial for several generalist predators and is actively sought by them (Soares et al 2004;Raubenheimer et al 2007;Harwood et al 2009;Marques et al 2015;Stowe et al 2021a). As such, landscapes with fewer diversity of crops or landscape diversity may manifest as decreases in the physiological condition of mobile predatory arthropods such as lady beetles, leading to longer-term population declines, as has been found for other beneficial insects (Hemberger et al 2021).…”
Context: Agricultural intensification is contributing to a global species decline. Underlying mechanisms include toxic effects of pesticides on non-target organisms and reductions in habitat and food availability. However, the effects of agricultural intensification on body condition, particularly of ecosystem service providing arthropods, are poorly understood.Objectives: Here, we investigated whether variations in the body condition of common lady beetle species (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) can be explained by the composition and configuration of the surrounding landscape. Assuming strong seasonal variation in food availability in intensively farmed regions, we included the entire period of lady beetle activity in our study.Methods: Lady beetles were collected from April to September 2011 in 30 landscapes in southern Wisconsin, USA. We examined how body size, body density, and lipid content of the beetles responded to the percentage of intensive cropland, habitat diversity, and edge density in the surrounding landscape.Results: The strongest predictor of body condition was the percentage of intensive cropland. For every 10% increase in cropland, body density decreased by about 3.9% and fat content by 6.4%. Landscape diversity and edge density correlated with body condition of individual species.Conclusions: In agriculturally intensified landscapes, lady beetles with reduced body condition may produce fewer offspring, have lower survival rates, and exert less effective pest control. Thus, our results suggest a mechanistic link between landscape patterns and observed declines in lady beetle populations. Our results also show that the expansion of monocultures affects even common cropland-associated species such as Harmonia axyridis, suggesting a long-term decline in biocontrol services in simplified agricultural landscapes.
Sowing flower strips along field edges is a widely adopted method for conserving pollinating insects in agricultural landscapes. To maximize the effect of flower strips given limited resources, we need spatially explicit tools that can prioritize their placement, and for identifying plant species to include in seed mixtures.
We sampled bees and plant species as well as their interactions in a semi‐controlled field experiment with roadside/field edge pairs with/without a sown flower strip at 31 sites in Norway and used a regional spatial model of solitary bee species richness to test if the effect of flower strips on bee species richness was predictable from the modelled solitary bee species richness.
We found that sites with flower strips were more bee species rich compared to sites without flower strips and that this effect was greatest in areas that the regional solitary bee species richness model had identified to be particularly important for bees. Spatial models revealed that even within small landscapes there were pronounced differences between field edges in the predicted effect of sowing flower strips.
Of the plant species that attracted the most bee species, the majority mainly attracted bumblebees and only few species also attracted solitary bees. Considering both the taxonomic diversity of bees and the species richness of bees attracted by plants we suggest that seed mixes containing Hieracium spp. such as Hieracium umbellatum, Pilosella officinarum, Taraxacum spp., Trifolium repens, Lotus corniculatus, Stellaria graminea and Achillea millefolium would provide resources for diverse bee communities in our region.
Spatial prediction models of bee diversity can be used to identify locations where flower strips are likely to have the largest effect and can thereby provide managers with an important tool for prioritizing how funding for agri‐environmental schemes such as flower strips should be allocated. Such flower strips should contain plant species that are attractive to both solitary and bumblebees, and do not need to be particularly plant species rich as long as the selected plants complement each other.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.