2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2010.11.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Historical and present developments of ejector refrigeration systems with emphasis on transcritical carbon dioxide air-conditioning applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
59
0
7

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
59
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Simultaneously, the smallest diffuser angle 5 o yielded the best ejector performance. Hence, both foregoing designed parameters can significantly influence the ejector performance (Elbel, 2011). The energy performance analysis indicated COP and cooling capacity improvement of the R744 transcritical ejector expansion cycle up to 7% and 8%, respectively, what confirmed the results presented in .…”
Section: The R744 Two-phase Ejector Technology In Refrigeration Systemsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Simultaneously, the smallest diffuser angle 5 o yielded the best ejector performance. Hence, both foregoing designed parameters can significantly influence the ejector performance (Elbel, 2011). The energy performance analysis indicated COP and cooling capacity improvement of the R744 transcritical ejector expansion cycle up to 7% and 8%, respectively, what confirmed the results presented in .…”
Section: The R744 Two-phase Ejector Technology In Refrigeration Systemsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Norman Gay patented refrigeration system with applied two phase ejector (Elbel, 2011). The two phase ejector characterizes two-phase flow outside the ejector, where the driving flow and driven flow are in liquid and vapor phase, respectively.…”
Section: The R744 Two-phase Ejector Technology In Refrigeration Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 7 presents the values of the relative errors between the model predictions and the experimental results for the critical mass flux. It can be seen that HEM tends to underpredict the critical mass flux, which is consistent with the published literatures [23,24]. This phenomenon is mainly because the homogeneous flow assumption neglects possible flashing delays caused by metastability [28,29], which results in the largest possible amount of vapor in the nozzle throat.…”
Section: Mass Flow Ratesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Elbel et al [23] investigated the critical mass flux of the convergingdiverging motive nozzle in the R744 ejector expansion refrigeration systems, and found that the deviations of the HEM predictions and the Henry-Fauske model predictions from the experimental mass flow rates are −10% ~ −20% and −5% ~ −10% respectively. Kornhauser and Harrell [24] found that the deviations of the experimental mass flow rate values from the HEM predictions are about 10% in their R134a ejector expansion refrigeration systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the reference transcritical CO 2 refrigeration cycle suffers from the defect of its low energy efficiency due to the large throttling loss [1]. This loss can be reduced by using a two-phase ejector to replace the throttling valve [2]. A two-phase ejector utilizes the expansion work to lift the suction pressure of the compressor so as to enhance the performance of the refrigeration cycle.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%